Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Flow cytometry aneuploidy and cell cycle indexing as a possible tool for differentiating between CD10+ diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and follicular lymphoma.
Azoulay, David; Cohen, Hector I; Dementiev, Eugene; Eshel, Elizabeth; Akria, Luiza; Shaoul, Ety; Horowitz, Netanel.
Afiliação
  • Azoulay D; Azrieli Faculty of Medicine, Bar-Ilan University, Safed, Israel.
  • Cohen HI; Hematology Unit and Laboratories, Galilee Medical Center, Naharia, Israel.
  • Dementiev E; Pathology Unit, Galilee Medical Center, Naharia, Israel.
  • Eshel E; Pathology Unit, Galilee Medical Center, Naharia, Israel.
  • Akria L; Hematology Unit and Laboratories, Ziv Medical Center, Safed, Israel.
  • Shaoul E; Azrieli Faculty of Medicine, Bar-Ilan University, Safed, Israel.
  • Horowitz N; Hematology Unit and Laboratories, Galilee Medical Center, Naharia, Israel.
Cytometry B Clin Cytom ; 98(5): 449-453, 2020 09.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31816181
BACKGROUND: Differential diagnosis between diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and follicular lymphoma (FL) becomes a challenge when adequate biopsy is unavailable. The present study aimed to investigate the applicability of DNA cell cycle analysis by flow cytometry (FC) for differentiating between CD10+ DLBCL and FL. METHODS: Data were collected from 57 specimens where CD5- /CD10+ /light chain restricted B cells were detected. DNA staining was performed using the Coulter DNA Prep Kit. Cell cycle fractions were evaluated by automatic analysis using the ModFit LT software. RESULTS: Histopathological analysis confirmed the diagnosis of CD10+ FL in 30 specimens (52.6%), CD10+ DLBCL in 24 specimens (42.1%), and CD10+ Burkitt lymphoma in 3 specimens (5.3%). A significantly higher rate of DNA aneuploidy was detected among CD10+ DLBCL than FL specimens (50 vs. 13.3% respectively, p = .003). Likewise, DNA index was significantly higher in CD10+ DLBCL relative to FL (1.26 ± 0.35 vs. 1.04 ± 0.16 respectively, p = .004). Notably, the proportion of cells in the S-phase and proliferative fraction was significantly higher in CD10+ DLBCL than in CD10+ FL (S-phase: 15.97 ± 13.94 vs. 4.43 ± 4.41 mean ± SD, respectively, p < .0001; proliferative fraction: 18.87 ± 15.17 vs. 5.78 ± 7.04 mean ± SD, respectively, p = .0001). Using a receiver operating characteristic analysis, optimal cutoffs for S-phase ≥7% and proliferative fraction ≥9% were determined. These values could be used to differentiate between CD10+ DLBCL and CD10+ FL. CONCLUSION: Including DNA cell cycle analysis in the FC lymphoma assessment panel may be of diagnostic value in differentiating between CD10+ DLBCL and FL when adequate biopsy is unavailable.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neprilisina / Linfoma Folicular / Linfoma Difuso de Grandes Células B / Citometria de Fluxo Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Cytometry B Clin Cytom Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Israel

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neprilisina / Linfoma Folicular / Linfoma Difuso de Grandes Células B / Citometria de Fluxo Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Cytometry B Clin Cytom Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Israel