Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Geospatial Mapping as a Guide for Resource Allocation Among Burn Centers in India.
Ranganathan, Kavitha; Mouch, Charles A; Chung, Michael; Mathews, Ian B; Cederna, Paul S; Raja Sabapathy, S; Raghavendran, Krishnan; Singhal, Maneesh.
Afiliação
  • Ranganathan K; Center for Global Surgery, Department of Surgery, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
  • Mouch CA; Department of Surgery, University of Michigan Health Systems, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
  • Chung M; Center for Global Surgery, Department of Surgery, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
  • Mathews IB; Department of Surgery, University of Michigan Health Systems, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
  • Cederna PS; Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI.
  • Raja Sabapathy S; Redivis Inc, Mountain View, California.
  • Raghavendran K; Department of Surgery, University of Michigan Health Systems, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
  • Singhal M; Department of Plastic Surgery, Hand, Reconstructive, and Burn Surgery, Ganga Hospital, Coimbatore, India.
J Burn Care Res ; 41(4): 853-858, 2020 07 03.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31875220
ABSTRACT
Timely treatment is essential for optimal outcomes after burn injury, but the method of resource distribution to ensure access to proper care in developing countries remains unclear. We therefore sought to examine access to burn care and the presence/absence of resources for burn care in India. We surveyed all eligible burn centers (n = 67) in India to evaluate burn care resources at each facility. We then performed a cross-sectional geospatial analysis using geocoding software (ArcGIS 10.3) and publicly available hospital-level data (WorldStreetMap, WorldPop database) to predict the time required to access care at the nearest burn center. Our primary outcome was the time required to reach a burn facility within India. Descriptive statistics were used to present our results. Of the 67 burn centers that completed the survey, 45% were government funded. More than 1 billion (75.1%) Indian citizens live within 2 hours of a burn center, but only 221.9 million (15.9%) live within 2 hours of a burn center with both an intensive care unit (ICU) and a skin bank. Burn units are staffed primarily by plastic surgeons (n = 62, 93%) with an average of 5.8 physicians per unit. Most burn units (n = 53, 79%) have access to hemodialysis. While many Indian citizens live within 2 hours of a burn center, most centers do not offer ICU and skin bank services that are essential for modern burn care. Reallocation of resources to improve transportation and availability of ICU and skin bank services is necessary to improve burn care in India.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Unidades de Queimados / Alocação de Recursos / Mapeamento Geográfico / Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: Asia Idioma: En Revista: J Burn Care Res Assunto da revista: TRAUMATOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Unidades de Queimados / Alocação de Recursos / Mapeamento Geográfico / Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: Asia Idioma: En Revista: J Burn Care Res Assunto da revista: TRAUMATOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article