Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Image quality of hip MR arthrography with intra-articular injection of hyaluronic acid versus gadolinium-based contrast agent in patients with femoroacetabular impingement.
Randelli, Filippo; Nocerino, Elisabetta Antonia; Nicosia, Luca; Alì, Marco; Monti, Caterina Beatrice; Sardanelli, Francesco; Aliprandi, Alberto.
Afiliação
  • Randelli F; Hip Department and Trauma, I.R.C.C.S. Policlinico San Donato, Milan, Italy.
  • Nocerino EA; Unit of Radiology, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Milan, Italy.
  • Nicosia L; Breast Radiology Unit, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy. lucanicosia88@gmail.com.
  • Alì M; Unit of Diagnostic Imaging and Stereotactic Radiosurgery, Centro Diagnostico Italiano, Milan, Italy.
  • Monti CB; Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.
  • Sardanelli F; Unit of Radiology, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Milan, Italy.
  • Aliprandi A; Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.
Skeletal Radiol ; 49(6): 937-944, 2020 Jun.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31915855
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To compare image quality of magnetic resonance arthrography (MRA) of the hip with intra-articular injection of high-viscosity hyaluronic acid (HA-MRA) versus Gd-based contrast agent (Gd-MRA) in patients with femoroacetabular impingement (FAI). MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

Design:

single-centre, observational, retrospective, inter-individual, and cross-sectional. FAI patients who underwent HA-MRA (3 mL of high-viscosity HA plus 17 mL of saline) were compared with 37 age- and sex-matched FAI patients who underwent Gd-MRA (20 mL of 2 mmol/L solution of gadopentetate dimeglumine). Two independent blinded radiologists assessed image quality for all sequences (two-dimensional proton density, non-fat-sat axial, fat-sat coronal and sagittal; three-dimensional dual-echo steady state), using a 5-point Likert scale considering separately labrum, cartilage, round ligament, transverse ligament, and capsule. Pearson χ2 and Cohen κ were used.

RESULTS:

The HA-MRA group was composed of 37 patients (23 males, 14 females; median age 38 years), the Gd-MRA group of 37 patients (21 males, 16 females; median age 38 years), without significant difference for age (p = 0.937) and sex (p = 0.636). Image quality did not differ between the two readers for any structure labrum (p ≥ 0.340), cartilage (p ≥ 0.198), round ligament (p ≥ 0.255), transverse ligament (p ≥ 0.806), and capsule (p ≥ 0.314). Inter-reader agreement (κ) ranged from 0.785 to 1.000.

CONCLUSIONS:

HA-MRA provided an image quality not significantly different from that of Gd-MRA. This may open the possibility of combining MRA and viscosupplementation in one single procedure.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética / Meios de Contraste / Gadolínio DTPA / Impacto Femoroacetabular / Ácido Hialurônico Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Skeletal Radiol Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Itália

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética / Meios de Contraste / Gadolínio DTPA / Impacto Femoroacetabular / Ácido Hialurônico Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Skeletal Radiol Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Itália