Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Computed Tomographic Assessment of Block Recession Trochleoplasty and Partial Parasagittal Patellectomy in Cats.
Brioschi, Valentina; Rutherford, Lynda; Newell, Karin; Trotter, Caroline; Arthurs, Gareth I.
Afiliação
  • Brioschi V; Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
  • Rutherford L; The Department of Clinical Science and Services, The Royal Veterinary College, London University, Hatfield, United Kingdom.
  • Newell K; Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
  • Trotter C; Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
  • Arthurs GI; Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol ; 33(2): 102-109, 2020 Mar.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31978936
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

The aim of this study was to assess computed tomography (CT) images of cadaveric feline stifles and record the relationship between the patella and femoral trochlea in normal stifles; then to investigate the effect of block recession trochleoplasty (BRT) with and without partial parasagittal patellectomy (PPP) on patellofemoral contact, depth of patellar recession and size of trochlea and patella. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

The sample population included six cat cadavers (12 stifles). Preoperative CT scans with stifles in three positions extended (155-165°), neutral (85-95°) and flexed (35-45°). Lateral stifle arthrotomy was followed by BRT. CT scans were taken as above. PPP was performed so the width of the patella was 1 mm narrower than the BRT. CT scans were repeated and CT measurements were taken.

RESULTS:

The area of contact between the patella and femoral trochlea was significantly reduced after BRT and then significantly increased after PPP. The depth of patellar recession was unchanged after BRT, but then was significantly higher after PPP. The patella was wider than the trochlea preoperatively and post-BRT and narrower post-PPP. Reduction in bone volume following PPP (mean 20%) was 50% the reduction in patella width (mean 40%).

CONCLUSION:

Block recession trochleoplasty did not improve patellar recession and decreased patellofemoral contact area. Following BRT, the patella rides the trochlear ridges and loses contact with the trochlear sulcus. Block recession trochleoplasty alone should not be performed in cats. Instead, BRT should be combined with PPP.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Patela / Joelho de Quadrúpedes / Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X / Fêmur Limite: Animals Idioma: En Revista: Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol Assunto da revista: MEDICINA VETERINARIA / ORTOPEDIA / TRAUMATOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Patela / Joelho de Quadrúpedes / Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X / Fêmur Limite: Animals Idioma: En Revista: Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol Assunto da revista: MEDICINA VETERINARIA / ORTOPEDIA / TRAUMATOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Reino Unido