Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Holmium: Yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser for endoscopic decompression of ureterocele in the first months of life: A comparison with electrosurgery.
Di Renzo, Dacia; Pizzuti, Giada; Lauriti, Giuseppe; Cascini, Valentina; Lelli Chiesa, Pierluigi.
Afiliação
  • Di Renzo D; Department of Medicine and Aging Sciences, "G. d'Annunzio" University of Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy.
  • Pizzuti G; Department of Pediatric Surgery, "Spirito Santo" Hospital of Pescara, Pescara, Italy.
  • Lauriti G; Department of Medicine and Aging Sciences, "G. d'Annunzio" University of Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy.
  • Cascini V; Department of Pediatric Surgery, "Spirito Santo" Hospital of Pescara, Pescara, Italy.
  • Lelli Chiesa P; Department of Medicine and Aging Sciences, "G. d'Annunzio" University of Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy.
Indian J Urol ; 36(1): 26-31, 2020.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31983823
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Few case series report the use of holmium yttrium-aluminum-garnet (HoYAG) laser to decompress ureterocele (UC) in pediatric population, and only two studies compared its outcomes with electrosurgery. This study aims to compare outcomes of HoYAG laser transurethral endoscopic puncture (TUP) versus electrosurgery TUP of UC in the 1st month of life, analyzing incidence of secondary surgery, redo TUP, and iatrogenic vesicoureteral reflux (VUR). PATIENTS AND

METHODS:

A retrospective study of patients treated by TUP of UC from 2008 to 2017 was performed. Those undergoing HoYAG laser TUP were included in Group A, those undergoing electrocautery TUP were included in Group B. Data were compared using Fisher's exact test.

RESULTS:

Group A included seven patients (mean follow-up 4 years). Two required a redo TUP. Two had preoperative VUR, which resolved after TUP. Two developed VUR after TUP, which resolved spontaneously. No secondary surgery was required. Group B included nine patients (mean follow-up 9.5 years). One required a redo TUP. Preoperative VUR was detected in 4/9 and persisted after TUP in 2. Three developed post-TUP VUR, which persisted. Five required further surgery because of persistent and symptomatic VUR. Secondary surgery was significantly lower after HoYAG laser compared to electrocautery TUP (P < 0.05). The incidences of both redo TUP and postoperative VUR were not significantly different between the two groups (P = ns).

CONCLUSION:

HoYAG laser TUP seems to be safe and effective in the decompression of obstructive UCs and maybe advantageous over electrocautery puncture. However, further studies with larger cohort are needed to corroborate our preliminary results.

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: Indian J Urol Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Itália

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: Indian J Urol Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Itália