Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Electronic participation-focused care planning support for families: a pilot study.
Jarvis, Jessica M; Kaelin, Vera C; Anaby, Dana; Teplicky, Rachel; Khetani, Mary A.
Afiliação
  • Jarvis JM; Department of Occupational Therapy, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
  • Kaelin VC; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
  • Anaby D; Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
  • Teplicky R; School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
  • Khetani MA; CanChild Centre for Childhood Disability Research, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Dev Med Child Neurol ; 62(8): 954-961, 2020 08.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32259292
ABSTRACT

AIM:

To evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary effects of Participation and Environment Measure-Plus (PEM+) 2.0, an optimized version of a web-based, participation-focused, care-planning tool.

METHOD:

Twenty-two caregivers of children aged 0 to 5 years receiving rehabilitation services, who reported dissatisfaction with their child's participation, had internet access, and could read and write English, were recruited for this 2-week, single-arm pilot trial. Feasibility was assessed through retention rates, completion time, percentage of care plans developed relative to caregiver reported need, and independent completion of PEM+ 2.0. Acceptability was assessed by the Usefulness, Satisfaction, and Ease of Use Questionnaire. Preliminary effects were assessed by two items on caregiver reported impact of PEM+ 2.0 on confidence for addressing their child's participation.

RESULTS:

Eighteen caregivers completed at least one iteration of PEM+ 2.0; of those, 17 were female and 15 were 30 to 39 years old. The median completion time was 12.99 minutes (quartile 1, 6.30; quartile 3, 17.33), mean care plan creation relative to need was 50% (standard deviation [SD] 31), and 17 completed PEM+ 2.0 independently. Mean acceptability scores were 3.80 to 4.97 (SD 1.25-1.97) and mean preliminary effect scores were 4.61 to 4.72 (SD 1.85-2.24), out of 7.0. There were strong and significant positive associations between two of the three estimates of PEM+ 2.0 acceptability and caregiver confidence (r=0.577-0.793, p<0.01).

INTERPRETATION:

Electronic health tools have the potential for facilitating family-centered care in pediatric rehabilitation. PEM+ 2.0 is a feasible tool within pediatric rehabilitation and has potential to be an acceptable tool for improving caregiver confidence for promoting their child's participation in valued activities. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS Participation and Environment Measure-Plus (PEM+) 2.0 is feasible for collaboratively engaging caregivers in the care-planning process. Caregivers perceived PEM+ 2.0 as helpful for thinking about their child's participation and what can be done to improve it. Feasibility and acceptability results will inform PEM+ 2.0 optimizations.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Planejamento de Assistência ao Paciente / Participação do Paciente / Reabilitação / Cuidadores / Telemedicina Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Prognostic_studies Limite: Adult / Child, preschool / Female / Humans / Infant / Male / Middle aged / Newborn Idioma: En Revista: Dev Med Child Neurol Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Planejamento de Assistência ao Paciente / Participação do Paciente / Reabilitação / Cuidadores / Telemedicina Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Prognostic_studies Limite: Adult / Child, preschool / Female / Humans / Infant / Male / Middle aged / Newborn Idioma: En Revista: Dev Med Child Neurol Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos