Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Treatment of Upper Limb Paresis With Repetitive Peripheral Nerve Sensory Stimulation and Motor Training: Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.
Conforto, Adriana B; Machado, André G; Menezes, Isabella; Ribeiro, Nathalia H V; Luccas, Rafael; Pires, Danielle S; Leite, Claudia da Costa; Plow, Ela B; Cohen, Leonardo G.
Afiliação
  • Conforto AB; Departamento de Neurologia, Hospital das Clínicas, São Paulo University, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Machado AG; Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, Instituto Israelita de Ensino e Pesquisa, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Menezes I; Núcleo de Apoio à Pesquisa em Neurociências (Center for Interdisciplinary Research on Applied Neurosciences: NAPNA), São Paulo University, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Ribeiro NHV; Departament of Neurosciences, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States.
  • Luccas R; Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, United States.
  • Pires DS; Departamento de Neurologia, Hospital das Clínicas, São Paulo University, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Leite CDC; Departamento de Neurologia, Hospital das Clínicas, São Paulo University, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Plow EB; Departamento de Neurologia, Hospital das Clínicas, São Paulo University, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Cohen LG; Departamento de Neurologia, Hospital das Clínicas, São Paulo University, São Paulo, Brazil.
Front Neurol ; 11: 196, 2020.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32269549
Background: Repetitive peripheral nerve sensory stimulation (RPSS) has emerged as a potential adjuvant strategy to motor training in stroke rehabilitation. The aim of this study is to test the hypothesis that 3 h sessions of active RPSS associated with functional electrical stimulation (FES) and task-specific training (TST) distributed three times a week, over 6 weeks, is more beneficial to improve upper limb motor function than sham RPSS in addition to FES and TST, in subjects with moderate to severe hand motor impairments in the chronic phase (>6 months) after stroke. Methods: In this single-center, randomized, placebo controlled, parallel-group, double-blind study we compare the effects of 18 sessions of active and sham RPSS as add-on interventions to FES and task-specific training of the paretic upper limb, in 40 subjects in the chronic phase after ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke, with Fugl-Meyer upper limb scores ranging from 7 to 50 and able to voluntarily activate any active range of wrist extension. The primary outcome measure is the Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT) after 6 weeks of treatment. The secondary outcomes are the WMFT at 3, 10, and 18 weeks after beginning of treatment, as well as the following outcomes measured at 3, 6, 10, and 18 weeks: Motor Activity Log; active range of motion of wrist extension and flexion; grasp and pinch strength in the paretic and non-paretic sides (the order of testing is randomized within and across subjects); Modified Ashworth Scale; Fugl-Meyer Assessment-Upper Limb in the paretic arm; Barthel Index; Stroke Impact Scale. Discussion: This project represents a major step in developing a rehabilitation strategy with potential to have impact on the treatment of stroke patients with poor motor recovery in developing countries worldwide. The study preliminarily evaluates a straightforward, non-invasive, inexpensive intervention. If feasibility and preliminary efficacy are demonstrated, further investigations of the proposed intervention (underlying mechanisms/ effects in larger numbers of patients) should be performed. Trial Registration: NCT02658578.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Guideline Idioma: En Revista: Front Neurol Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Brasil

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Guideline Idioma: En Revista: Front Neurol Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Brasil