Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Intense Pulsed Light for Meibomian Gland Disease: A Report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology.
Wladis, Edward J; Aakalu, Vinay K; Foster, Jill A; Freitag, Suzanne K; Sobel, Rachel K; Tao, Jeremiah P; Yen, Michael T.
Afiliação
  • Wladis EJ; Ophthalmic Plastic Surgery, Lions Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, Albany Medical Center, Albany (Slingerlands), New York.
  • Aakalu VK; Illinois Eye and Ear Infirmary, University of Illinois College of Medicine at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
  • Foster JA; Ophthalmic Surgeons and Consultants of Ohio, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
  • Freitag SK; Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
  • Sobel RK; Vanderbilt Eye Institute, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
  • Tao JP; Gavin Herbert Eye Institute, University of California, Irvine School of Medicine, Irvine, California.
  • Yen MT; Cullen Eye Institute, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.
Ophthalmology ; 127(9): 1227-1233, 2020 09.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32327256
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

To review the literature on the efficacy of intense pulsed light (IPL) on the eyelids in the management of meibomian gland disease (MGD) and meibomian gland-related ocular surface disease.

METHODS:

A literature search was last conducted on May 15, 2019, in the PubMed and Cochrane Library databases for English-language original research that assessed the effect of IPL on MGD in adult patients. Thirty-three articles were identified, and 12 studies were determined to be relevant to the criteria outlined for assessment. The panel methodologist (V.K.A.) assigned a level of evidence rating to each study; 4 studies were rated level II, and 8 studies were rated level III. Five studies had potential conflicts of interest and design limitations that affected interpretation of results.

RESULTS:

All studies documented improvement in clinically meaningful metrics, including tear breakup time (TBUT), corneal staining and eyelid margin measurements, meibum quality, meibomian gland expressability, ocular surface disease index (OSDI), and standard patient evaluation of eye dryness (SPEED) questionnaire scores. Side effects were relatively uncommon but included discomfort, cutaneous erythema, blistering, eyelash loss, and floaters; these were uniformly self-limited.

CONCLUSIONS:

Although methodological limitations and potential conflicts of interest in some studies raised concern, the existing body of literature demonstrates improvements in the signs and symptoms of MGD after IPL therapy.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Oftalmologia / Avaliação da Tecnologia Biomédica / Síndromes do Olho Seco / Terapia de Luz Pulsada Intensa / Disfunção da Glândula Tarsal Tipo de estudo: Health_technology_assessment / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Female / Humans / Male País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Ophthalmology Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Oftalmologia / Avaliação da Tecnologia Biomédica / Síndromes do Olho Seco / Terapia de Luz Pulsada Intensa / Disfunção da Glândula Tarsal Tipo de estudo: Health_technology_assessment / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Female / Humans / Male País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Ophthalmology Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article