Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A heuristic model for collaborative practice - Part 1: a meta-synthesis of empirical findings on collaborative strategies in community mental health and substance abuse practice.
Sundet, Rolf; Kim, Hesook Suzie; Karlsson, Bengt Eirik; Borg, Marit; Sælør, Knut Tore; Ness, Ottar.
Afiliação
  • Sundet R; Universitetet i Sorost-Norge, Drammen, Norway.
  • Kim HS; Universitetet i Sorost-Norge, Drammen, Norway.
  • Karlsson BE; Universitetet i Sorost-Norge, Drammen, Norway.
  • Borg M; Universitetet i Sorost-Norge, Drammen, Norway.
  • Sælør KT; Universitetet i Sorost-Norge, Drammen, Norway.
  • Ness O; Universitetet i Sorost-Norge, Drammen, Norway.
Int J Ment Health Syst ; 14: 42, 2020.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32528553
BACKGROUND: Collaboration has become a cornerstone for healthcare practice in recent decades resulting in the efforts at international and national levels to integrate the concept into healthcare practice and services. However, there is a paucity of research delineating strategies for professionals to apply in collaborative practice with clients in general as well as in mental health and substance abuse (MHSA) care. METHODS: The method applied in this paper is a form of qualitative meta-synthesis referring to the integration of findings from multiple qualitative studies within a program of research by the same investigators. Eighteen empirical papers with the focus on community MHSA practice and recovery-orientation with relevance to the service user-professional relationship in MHSA practice were included in this meta-synthesis. RESULTS: Three types of processes of collaboration specified by meta-themes were identified. The meta-themes of the interactive-dialogical process type include (a) maintaining human relationship, (b) walking alongside, (c) information sharing, (d) seizing the present moment, (e) taking the perspective of the other, and (f) aligning/scaffolding. The meta-themes of the negotiated-participatory engagement type include (a) feedback-informing process, (b) putting differences to work, (c) negotiated partnering, (d) accommodating user participation, and (e) addressing the tension between help and control. The meta-themes of the negotiated supportive process type are (a) helping in context, (b) coordinating, (c) pulling together, (d) advocating, and (e) availing. These meta-themes are strategies for collaboration applicable in MHSA practice. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-synthesis of collaborative processes found in community mental health practice points to the possibility of developing a set of repertoires of practice for service user/professional collaboration, especially in community MHSA practice.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Systematic_reviews Idioma: En Revista: Int J Ment Health Syst Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Noruega

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Systematic_reviews Idioma: En Revista: Int J Ment Health Syst Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Noruega