Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Photofunctionalization as a suitable approach to improve the osseointegration of implants in animal models-A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Dini, Caroline; Nagay, Bruna Egumi; Magno, Marcela Baraúna; Maia, Lucianne Cople; Barão, Valentim Adelino Ricardo.
Afiliação
  • Dini C; Department of Prosthodontics and Periodontology, Piracicaba Dental School, University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Piracicaba, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Nagay BE; Department of Prosthodontics and Periodontology, Piracicaba Dental School, University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Piracicaba, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Magno MB; Department of Pediatric Dentistry and Orthodontics, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
  • Maia LC; Department of Pediatric Dentistry and Orthodontics, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
  • Barão VAR; Department of Prosthodontics and Periodontology, Piracicaba Dental School, University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Piracicaba, São Paulo, Brazil.
Clin Oral Implants Res ; 31(9): 785-802, 2020 Sep.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32564392
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

To determine whether photofunctionalization influences dental implant osseointegration. MATERIAL AND

METHODS:

Data on osseointegration rates were extracted from 8 databases, based on bone-to-implant contact (BIC) and pushout tests. Internal validity was accessed through the SYRCLE risk of bias tool for animal experimental studies. Meta-analyses were performed for investigation of the influence of photofunctionalization on implant osseointegration, with a random effect and a confidence interval of 95%. The certainty of evidence was accessed through the GRADE approach.

RESULTS:

Thirty-four records were identified, and 10 were included in the meta-analysis. Photofunctionalized implants showed higher mean values for BIC in rabbits (MD 6.92 [1.01, 12.82], p = .02), dogs (MD 23.70 [10.23, 37.16], p = .001), rats (MD 20.93 [12.91, 28.95], p < .0001), and in the pooled BIC analyses (MD 14.23 [7.80, 20.66], p < .0001) compared to those in control implants in the overall assay. Conversely, at late healing periods, the pooled BIC meta-analyses showed no statistically significant differences (p > .05) for photofunctionalized and control implants at 12 weeks of follow-up. For pushout analysis, photofunctionalized implants presented greater bone strength integration (MD 19.92 [13.88, 25.96], p < .0001) compared to that of control implants. The heterogeneity between studies ranged from "not important" to "moderate" for rabbits I2  = 24%, dogs I2  = 0%, rats I2  = 0%, and pooled BIC (I2  = 49%), while considerable heterogeneity was observed for pushouts (I2  = 90%).

CONCLUSION:

Photofunctionalization improves osseointegration in the initial healing period of implants, as summarized from available data from rabbit, dog, and rat in vivo models.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Implantes Dentários / Osseointegração Tipo de estudo: Systematic_reviews Limite: Animals Idioma: En Revista: Clin Oral Implants Res Assunto da revista: ODONTOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Brasil

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Implantes Dentários / Osseointegração Tipo de estudo: Systematic_reviews Limite: Animals Idioma: En Revista: Clin Oral Implants Res Assunto da revista: ODONTOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Brasil