Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Wide Area Transepithelial Sampling with Computer-Assisted Analysis (WATS3D) Is Cost-Effective in Barrett's Esophagus Screening.
Singer, Mendel E; Smith, Michael S.
Afiliação
  • Singer ME; Department of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.
  • Smith MS; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mount Sinai West and Mount Sinai Morningside Hospitals, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Ambulatory Care Center, 13th Floor, 440 W 114th St., New York, NY, 10025, USA. michael.smith1@mountsinai.org.
Dig Dis Sci ; 66(5): 1572-1579, 2021 05.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32578042
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Wide area transepithelial sampling with three-dimensional computer-assisted analysis (WATS3D) is an adjunct to the standard random 4-quadrant forceps biopsies (FB, "Seattle protocol") that significantly increases the detection of Barrett's esophagus (BE) and associated neoplasia in patients undergoing screening or surveillance.

AIMS:

To examine the cost-effectiveness of adding WATS3D to the Seattle protocol in screening patients for BE.

METHODS:

A decision analytic model was used to compare the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of two alternative BE screening strategies in chronic gastroesophageal reflux disease patients FB with and without WATS3D. The reference case was a 60-year-old white male with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Effectiveness was measured by the number needed to screen to avert one cancer and one cancer-related death, and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). Cost was measured in 2019 US$, and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was measured in $/QALY using thresholds for cost-effectiveness of $100,000/QALY and $150,000/QALY. Cost was measured in 2019 US$. Cost and QALYs were discounted at 3% per year.

RESULTS:

Between 320 and 337 people would need to be screened with WATS3D in addition to FB to avert one additional cancer, and 328-367 people to avert one cancer-related death. Screening with WATS3D costs an additional $1219 and produced an additional 0.017 QALYs, for an ICER of $71,395/QALY. All one-way sensitivity analyses resulted in ICERs under $84,000/QALY.

CONCLUSIONS:

Screening for BE in 60-year-old white male GERD patients is more cost-effective when WATS3D is used adjunctively to the Seattle protocol than with the Seattle protocol alone.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Esôfago de Barrett / Neoplasias Esofágicas / Refluxo Gastroesofágico / Diagnóstico por Computador / Custos de Cuidados de Saúde / Células Epiteliais / Detecção Precoce de Câncer / Mucosa Esofágica Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Health_economic_evaluation / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Screening_studies Limite: Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Dig Dis Sci Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Esôfago de Barrett / Neoplasias Esofágicas / Refluxo Gastroesofágico / Diagnóstico por Computador / Custos de Cuidados de Saúde / Células Epiteliais / Detecção Precoce de Câncer / Mucosa Esofágica Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Health_economic_evaluation / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Screening_studies Limite: Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Dig Dis Sci Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos