Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Risk factors for spinal cord injury and complications of cerebrospinal fluid drainage in patients undergoing fenestrated and branched endovascular aneurysm repair.
Kitpanit, Napong; Ellozy, Sharif H; Connolly, Peter H; Agrusa, Christopher J; Lichtman, Adam D; Schneider, Darren B.
Afiliação
  • Kitpanit N; Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY; Department of Surgery, Bhumibol Adulyadej Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand.
  • Ellozy SH; Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY.
  • Connolly PH; Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY.
  • Agrusa CJ; Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY.
  • Lichtman AD; Department of Anesthesiology, Weill Cornell Medicine, NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY.
  • Schneider DB; Division of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, The Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa. Electronic address: darren.schneider@pennmedicine.upenn.edu.
J Vasc Surg ; 73(2): 399-409.e1, 2021 02.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32640318
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

Spinal cord injury (SCI) is one of the most devastating complications of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA) repair. Cerebrospinal fluid drainage (CSFD) is routinely used to prevent and to treat SCI during open TAAA repair. However, the risks and benefits of CSFD during fenestrated-branched endovascular aneurysm repair (F/B-EVAR) are unclear. This study aimed to determine the risk of SCI after F/B-EVAR and to assess the risks and benefits of CSFD.

METHODS:

We analyzed 106 consecutive patients with TAAAs treated with F/B-EVAR from 2014 to 2019 in a prospective physician-sponsored investigational device exemption study (G130193). Data were collected prospectively and audited by an independent external monitor. All patients were treated with Cook manufactured patient-specific F/B-EVAR devices or the Cook t-Branch devices (Cook Medical, Bloomington, Ind). CSFD was used at the discretion of the principal investigator. Risk factors for SCI were identified, and CSFD complications were assessed.

RESULTS:

Prophylactic CSFD was used in 78 patients (73.6%), and 28 patients (26.4%) underwent F/B-EVAR without CSFD. Four patients (3.8%) with prophylactic CSFD developed SCI, including two patients (1.9%) with permanent paraplegia (Tarlov grade 1-2) and two patients (1.9%) with paraparesis (Tarlov grade 3). Multivariate analysis revealed that greater extent of thoracic aortic coverage (odds ratio, 1.06; 95% confidence interval, 1.00-1.11; P = .02) and intraoperative blood loss (odds ratio, 1.00; 95% confidence interval, 1.00-1.002; P = .04) were the significant risk factors for SCI. Six patients (7.6% [6/78]) experienced major CSFD-related complications, including subarachnoid hemorrhage in 2.6% (2), spinal hematoma in 2.6% (2), cerebellar hemorrhage in 1.3% (1), and spinal drain fracture requiring surgical laminectomy in 1.3% (1). Minor CSFD-related complications occurred in 20 patients (25.6% [20/78]), including paresthesia during CSFD insertion (10), minimal bloody cerebrospinal fluid (7), drain malfunction (2), and reflex hypotension (1). Technical difficulties during CSFD catheter placement were noted in seven patients (9.0%). Excluding four patients with SCI, intensive care unit stay was 3.3 ± 4.0 days in the CSFD group vs 1.2 ± 0.9 days in the no-CSFD group (P = .007). Total hospital length of stay was 6.0 ± 4.9 days in the CSFD group vs 3.5 ± 1.9 days in the no-CSFD group (P = .01).

CONCLUSIONS:

The incidence of SCI after F/B-EVAR with selective CSFD was low, and risk factors for SCI were greater with extent of thoracic aortic coverage and intraoperative blood loss. However, the incidence of major CSFD-related complications exceeded the incidence of SCI, and CSFD significantly increased both intensive care unit and total hospital length of stay. Therefore, routine prophylactic CSFD may not be justified, and a prospective randomized trial of CSFD in patients undergoing F/B-EVAR seems appropriate.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Traumatismos da Medula Espinal / Drenagem / Aneurisma da Aorta Torácica / Implante de Prótese Vascular / Isquemia do Cordão Espinal / Procedimentos Endovasculares Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: J Vasc Surg Assunto da revista: ANGIOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Tailândia

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Traumatismos da Medula Espinal / Drenagem / Aneurisma da Aorta Torácica / Implante de Prótese Vascular / Isquemia do Cordão Espinal / Procedimentos Endovasculares Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: J Vasc Surg Assunto da revista: ANGIOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Tailândia