Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Economic Evaluation of Population-Based BRCA1/BRCA2 Mutation Testing across Multiple Countries and Health Systems.
Manchanda, Ranjit; Sun, Li; Patel, Shreeya; Evans, Olivia; Wilschut, Janneke; De Freitas Lopes, Ana Carolina; Gaba, Faiza; Brentnall, Adam; Duffy, Stephen; Cui, Bin; Coelho De Soarez, Patricia; Husain, Zakir; Hopper, John; Sadique, Zia; Mukhopadhyay, Asima; Yang, Li; Berkhof, Johannes; Legood, Rosa.
Afiliação
  • Manchanda R; Wolfson Institute for Preventive Medicine, CRUK Barts Cancer Centre, Queen Mary University of London, London EC1M 6BQ, UK.
  • Sun L; Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Barts Health NHS Trust, Royal London Hospital, London E1 1BB, UK.
  • Patel S; MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Institute of Clinical Trials & Methodology, Faculty of Population Health Sciences, University College London, London WC1V 6LJ, UK.
  • Evans O; Wolfson Institute for Preventive Medicine, CRUK Barts Cancer Centre, Queen Mary University of London, London EC1M 6BQ, UK.
  • Wilschut J; Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London WC1H 9SH, UK.
  • De Freitas Lopes AC; Wolfson Institute for Preventive Medicine, CRUK Barts Cancer Centre, Queen Mary University of London, London EC1M 6BQ, UK.
  • Gaba F; Wolfson Institute for Preventive Medicine, CRUK Barts Cancer Centre, Queen Mary University of London, London EC1M 6BQ, UK.
  • Brentnall A; Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Barts Health NHS Trust, Royal London Hospital, London E1 1BB, UK.
  • Duffy S; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 1081 HV Amsterdam, Netherlands.
  • Cui B; Departamento de Medicina Preventiva, Faculdade de Medicina FMUSP, Universidade de Sao Paulo, 01246903 Sao Paulo, Brazil.
  • Coelho De Soarez P; Wolfson Institute for Preventive Medicine, CRUK Barts Cancer Centre, Queen Mary University of London, London EC1M 6BQ, UK.
  • Husain Z; Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Barts Health NHS Trust, Royal London Hospital, London E1 1BB, UK.
  • Hopper J; Centre for Cancer Prevention, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London EC1M 6BQ, UK.
  • Sadique Z; Centre for Cancer Prevention, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London EC1M 6BQ, UK.
  • Mukhopadhyay A; School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing 100191, China.
  • Yang L; Departamento de Medicina Preventiva, Faculdade de Medicina FMUSP, Universidade de Sao Paulo, 01246903 Sao Paulo, Brazil.
  • Berkhof J; Department of Humanities & Social Sciences, Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur, West Bengal 721302, India.
  • Legood R; Department of Economics, Presidency University, Kolkata 700073, India.
Cancers (Basel) ; 12(7)2020 Jul 17.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32708835
ABSTRACT
Clinical criteria/Family history-based BRCA testing misses a large proportion of BRCA carriers who can benefit from screening/prevention. We estimate the cost-effectiveness of population-based BRCA testing in general population women across different countries/health systems. A Markov model comparing the lifetime costs and effects of BRCA1/BRCA2 testing all general population women ≥30 years compared with clinical criteria/FH-based testing. Separate analyses are undertaken for the UK/USA/Netherlands (high-income countries/HIC), China/Brazil (upper-middle income countries/UMIC) and India (low-middle income countries/LMIC) using both health system/payer and societal perspectives. BRCA carriers undergo appropriate screening/prevention interventions to reduce breast cancer (BC) and ovarian cancer (OC) risk. Outcomes include OC, BC, and additional heart disease deaths and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER)/quality-adjusted life year (QALY). Probabilistic/one-way sensitivity analyses evaluate model uncertainty. For the base case, from a societal perspective, we found that population-based BRCA testing is cost-saving in HIC (UK-ICER = $-5639/QALY; USA-ICER = $-4018/QALY; Netherlands-ICER = $-11,433/QALY), and it appears cost-effective in UMIC (China-ICER = $18,066/QALY; Brazil-ICER = $13,579/QALY), but it is not cost-effective in LMIC (India-ICER = $23,031/QALY). From a payer perspective, population-based BRCA testing is highly cost-effective in HIC (UK-ICER = $21,191/QALY, USA-ICER = $16,552/QALY, Netherlands-ICER = $25,215/QALY), and it is cost-effective in UMIC (China-ICER = $23,485/QALY, Brazil-ICER = $20,995/QALY), but it is not cost-effective in LMIC (India-ICER = $32,217/QALY). BRCA testing costs below $172/test (ICER = $19,685/QALY), which makes it cost-effective (from a societal perspective) for LMIC/India. Population-based BRCA testing can prevent an additional 2319 to 2666 BC and 327 to 449 OC cases per million women than the current clinical strategy. Findings suggest that population-based BRCA testing for countries evaluated is extremely cost-effective across HIC/UMIC health systems, is cost-saving for HIC health systems from a societal perspective, and can prevent tens of thousands more BC/OC cases.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Evaluation_studies / Health_economic_evaluation / Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Cancers (Basel) Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Evaluation_studies / Health_economic_evaluation / Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Cancers (Basel) Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Reino Unido