Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Efficacy of proteasome inhibitor-based maintenance following autologous transplantation in multiple myeloma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Parrondo, Ricardo D; Reljic, Tea; Iqbal, Madiha; Ayala, Ernesto; Kharfan-Dabaja, Mohamed A; Kumar, Ambuj; Murthy, Hemant S.
Afiliação
  • Parrondo RD; Division of Hematology-Oncology and Blood and Marrow Transplantation Program, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA.
  • Reljic T; Program for Comparative Effectiveness Research, Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA.
  • Iqbal M; Division of Hematology-Oncology and Blood and Marrow Transplantation Program, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA.
  • Ayala E; Division of Hematology-Oncology and Blood and Marrow Transplantation Program, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA.
  • Kharfan-Dabaja MA; Division of Hematology-Oncology and Blood and Marrow Transplantation Program, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA.
  • Kumar A; Program for Comparative Effectiveness Research, Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA.
  • Murthy HS; Division of Hematology-Oncology and Blood and Marrow Transplantation Program, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA.
Eur J Haematol ; 106(1): 40-48, 2021 Jan.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32799387
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Lenalidomide maintenance, commonly prescribed in the postautologous transplantation (AHCT) setting for multiple myeloma (MM), is associated with development of secondary primary malignancies (SPM). Proteasome inhibitor maintenance (PIM) has also been evaluated in MM. We conduct a systematic review/meta-analysis to assess the efficacy of PIM in MM.

METHODS:

Performing a comprehensive search of the medical literature using PubMed/Medline and EMBASE on September 11, 2019, we extracted data on clinical outcomes related to benefits (OS, PFS, and depth of hematologic response [DOHR]) and harms (SPM and adverse events). 2144 references were identified; three studies were eligible for inclusion.

RESULTS:

A total of 1760 patients were included in the analysis; 507 patients received bortezomib and 395 received ixazomib maintenance. Control arms were either placebo (n = 261) or thalidomide (n = 358). PIM did not improve OS (HR 0.88, 95% CI 0.73-1.05, P = .15) but improved PFS (HR 0.77, 95% CI 0.69-0.86, P ≤ .00001) and DOHR (HR 0.88, 95% CI 0.79-0.98, P = .02) compared with control. There were no significant differences between PIM and control regarding SPM (p = NS) and ≥grade 3 peripheral neuropathy (PN) (p = NS).

CONCLUSIONS:

PIM following AHCT in MM improves PFS and DOHR without an increase in development of SPM or severe PN compared with placebo/thalidomide.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica / Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas / Inibidores de Proteassoma / Mieloma Múltiplo Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Eur J Haematol Assunto da revista: HEMATOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica / Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas / Inibidores de Proteassoma / Mieloma Múltiplo Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Eur J Haematol Assunto da revista: HEMATOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos