Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The evolution of emergency general surgery: its time for a dedicated program manager.
Eaton, Barbara; O'Meara, Lindsay; Aresco, Carla; Scalea, Thomas; Diaz, Jose; Bruns, Brandon.
Afiliação
  • Eaton B; Division of Acute Care Surgery, University of Maryland, R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center, 22 South Greene St, Baltimore, MD, 21201, USA. beaton@umm.edu.
  • O'Meara L; Division of Acute Care Surgery, University of Maryland, R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center, 22 South Greene St, Baltimore, MD, 21201, USA.
  • Aresco C; Division of Acute Care Surgery, University of Maryland, R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center, 22 South Greene St, Baltimore, MD, 21201, USA.
  • Scalea T; Division of Acute Care Surgery, University of Maryland, R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center, 22 South Greene St, Baltimore, MD, 21201, USA.
  • Diaz J; Department of Surgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, 22 South Greene St, Baltimore, MD, 21201, USA.
  • Bruns B; Division of Acute Care Surgery, University of Maryland, R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center, 22 South Greene St, Baltimore, MD, 21201, USA.
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg ; 48(1): 5-11, 2022 Feb.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32885311
BACKGROUND: Emergency general surgery (EGS) is emerging as a distinct sub-specialty of acute care surgery but continues to exist without essential processes that drive modern trauma programs. An EGS-specific quality program was created with service-based Advanced Practice Provider (SB APP) administrative oversight, thus validating the need for a dedicated EGS program manager. METHODS: In 2017, a quality structure was formalized with primary focus on scheduled quality meetings, peer review and outcomes review. All admission, service-specific dashboards, and readmission data were manually audited by SB APPs to confirm accuracy and identify opportunities for process improvement. RESULTS: Surgical quality metrics including patient volume, mortality, complications, readmission and infection prevention indicators, were reviewed by SBAPPs. Annual EMR data for all EGS patients was compared to data collected via manual review with a novel registry logic. Comparison of EMR generated data versus EGS registry data identified under-representation of total admissions: in 2016, the EMR identified 130 admissions with registry logic identifying 625 actual EGS admissions. The EMR identified 515 admissions in 2017 and 485 admission in 2018 with registry logic identifying 777 and 712, respectively. Review of readmission data revealed an error of 14 patients in 2017 and 11 patients in 2018. CONCLUSIONS: The quest to improve quality of care for the EGS patient requires timely review of high-quality, accurate data by dedicated and trained personnel. Our process revealed the vital functions of an EGS PM are crucial in the evolution of the EGS specialty. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV economic and value-based evaluations.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Cirurgia Geral / Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Operatórios Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Observational_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Cirurgia Geral / Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Operatórios Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Observational_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos