Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Esophageal Atresia and Associated Duodenal Atresia: A Cohort Study and Review of the Literature.
Miscia, Maria Enrica; Lauriti, Giuseppe; Di Renzo, Dacia; Riccio, Angela; Lisi, Gabriele; Lelli Chiesa, Pierluigi.
Afiliação
  • Miscia ME; Pediatric Surgery Unit, Department of Medicine and Aging Science, University Gabriele d'Annunzio of Chieti Pescara Pescara, Italy.
  • Lauriti G; Department of Pediatric Surgery, Department of Medicine and Aging Science, University Gabriele d'Annunzio of Chieti and Pescara, Chieti, Abruzzo, Italy.
  • Di Renzo D; Department of Pediatric Surgery, Ospedale Civile dello Spirito Santo, Pescara, Abruzzo, Italy.
  • Riccio A; UO Chirurgia Pediatrica, Ospedale Civile dello Spirito Santo, Pescara, Abruzzo, Italy.
  • Lisi G; Department of Pediatric Surgery, Department of Medicine and Aging Science, University Gabriele d'Annunzio of Chieti and Pescara, Chieti, Abruzzo, Italy.
  • Lelli Chiesa P; Pediatric Surgery Unit, Department of Medicine and Aging Science, University Gabriele d'Annunzio of Chieti Pescara Pescara, Italy.
Eur J Pediatr Surg ; 31(5): 445-451, 2021 Oct.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32987434
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Esophageal atresia (EA) is associated with duodenal atresia (DA) in 3 to 6% of cases. The management of this association is controversial and literature is scarce on the topic. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

We aimed to (1) review the patients with EA + DA treated at our institution and (2) systematically review the English literature, including case series of three or more patients.

RESULTS:

Cohort study Five of seventy-four patients with EA had an associated DA (6.8%). Four of five cases (80%) underwent primary repair of both atresia, one of them with gastrostomy placement (25%). One of five cases (20%) had a delayed diagnosis of DA. No mortality has occurred. Systematic Review Six of six-hundred forty-five abstract screened were included (78 patients). Twenty-four of sixty-eight (35.3%) underwent primary correction of EA + DA, and 36/68 (52.9%) underwent staged correction. Nine of thirty-six (25%) had a missed diagnosis of DA. Thirty-six of sixty-eight underwent gastrostomy placement. Complications were observed in 14/36 patients (38.9 ± 8.2%). Overall mortality reported was 41.0 ± 30.1% (32/78 patients), in particular its incidence was 41.7 ± 27.0% after a primary treatment and 37.0 ± 44.1% following a staged approach.

CONCLUSION:

The management of associated EA and DA remains controversial. It seems that the staged or primary correction does not affect the mortality. Surgeons should not overlook DA when correcting an EA.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Gastrostomia / Obstrução Duodenal / Atresia Esofágica Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Female / Humans / Male / Newborn Idioma: En Revista: Eur J Pediatr Surg Assunto da revista: PEDIATRIA Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Itália

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Gastrostomia / Obstrução Duodenal / Atresia Esofágica Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Female / Humans / Male / Newborn Idioma: En Revista: Eur J Pediatr Surg Assunto da revista: PEDIATRIA Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Itália