Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Capacity Prioritization Initiative Reduced the Wait Time for Port Placement and Facilitated Increased Volume of Port Placements at a Large County Health System.
McDevitt, Joseph L; Quadri, Rehan S; Sutphin, Patrick D; Zeikus, Eric; Kwon, Jeannie K; Browning, Travis; Reddick, Mark.
Afiliação
  • McDevitt JL; Department of Radiology, University of Texas-Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX. Electronic address: josephlmcdevitt@icloud.com.
  • Quadri RS; Department of Radiology, University of Texas-Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX.
  • Sutphin PD; Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA.
  • Zeikus E; Department of Radiology, University of Texas-Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX.
  • Kwon JK; Department of Radiology, University of Texas-Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX.
  • Browning T; Department of Radiology, University of Texas-Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX.
  • Reddick M; Department of Radiology, University of Texas-Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX.
Curr Probl Diagn Radiol ; 50(3): 288-292, 2021.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33010973
DESCRIPTION OF THE PROBLEM: Wait time from request to placement of ports in interventional radiology had increased from 14 to 27 days over a 4-month period. The goal of this project was to reduce the wait time by 15% within 4 months while accommodating additional volume. INSTITUIONAL APPROACH TO ADDRESS PROBLEM: Capacity analysis revealed 2 bottlenecks: (1) inadequate provider capacity for preprocedural visits in interventional radiology clinic and (2) inadequate number of spots for port placement in the angiography schedule. The intervention consisted of: (1) 2 reserved slots in the attending physician's morning clinic schedule and (2) 3 daily guaranteed spots for port placement in the angiography suite. Both changes were integrated into the electronic medical record scheduling system. DESCRIPTION OF OUTCOMES: After the intervention, per biweekly period, the number of port requests increased by 17% (Preintervention: 16.6 ± 3.1, Postintervention: 20.1 ± 4.1, P = 0.03), the number of completed clinic visits increased by 19% (Preintervention: 16.7 ± 5.1, Postintervention: 20.5 ± 3.6, P = 0.05), and the number of port placements increased by 19% (Preintervention: 16.9 ± 3.9, Postintervention: 21.0 ± 3.5, P = 0.02). The average wait time from request to placement decreased by 22% (Preintervention: 22.2 ± 4.4 days, Postintervention: 18.3 ± 3.4 days, P = 0.03), driven by a 49% decrease in wait time between request and clinic visit (Preintervention: 11.0 ± 2.3 days, Postintervention: 7.4 ± 1.0 days, P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Prioritization of clinic and angiography suite capacity, integrated into the electronic scheduling system, significantly reduced the wait time for port placement, even with significant increases in the volume of port requests.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Listas de Espera / Instituições de Assistência Ambulatorial Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Curr Probl Diagn Radiol Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Listas de Espera / Instituições de Assistência Ambulatorial Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Curr Probl Diagn Radiol Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article