Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Continuous positive airway pressure with deep inspiration breath hold in left-sided breast radiation therapy.
Reckhow, Jensen; Kaidar-Person, Orit; Ben-David, Merav A; Ostrovski, Anna; Ilinsky, Dina; Goldstein, Jeffrey; Symon, Zvi; Galper, Shira.
Afiliação
  • Reckhow J; International Health at Ben Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheva, Israel; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
  • Kaidar-Person O; Radiation Unit, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel. Electronic address: orit.kaidarperson@sheba.health.gov.il.
  • Ben-David MA; Assuta Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel.
  • Ostrovski A; Radiation Unit, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel.
  • Ilinsky D; Radiation Unit, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel.
  • Goldstein J; Radiation Unit, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel.
  • Symon Z; Radiation Unit, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel.
  • Galper S; Radiation Unit, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel.
Med Dosim ; 46(2): 127-131, 2021.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33020023
ABSTRACT
A dosimetric study to evaluate the use of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), with free-breathing (CPAP-FB) or with deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH-CPAP) an adjunct and alternative to DIBH to reduce heart and lung dose in the radiation therapy (RT) of breast cancer planned for left side RT with regional nodes and internal mammary. A retrospective analysis of 10 left-sided breast cancer patients whose heart or lung dose constraints were not met after RT planning based on FB or DIBH simulations and were referred for CPAP-based planning. All patients were simulated using FB, DIBH, CPAP-FB, and CPAP-DIBH. Treatment plans were calculated to cover the breast/chest wall and regional nodes using tangential field-in-field technique (FiF). Dose-volume parameters for heart, ipsilateral lung, and contralateral breast were compared using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. For all RT plans, mean heart dose (Gy) was lower for treatment plans with CPAP CPAP-FB (mean 3.4 vs 7.4, p = 0.001) and CPAP-DIBH (mean 2.5 vs 7.4, p = 0.006) compared to FB alone. CPAP-DIBH also significantly reduced MHD as compared to DIBH alone (mean 2.5 vs 4.3 Gy, p = 0.013). CPAP-DIBH significantly reduced mean lung dose as compared to both FB (mean 14.4 vs 20.1, p = 0.005) and DIBH alone (mean 14.4 vs 17.4, p = 0.007). Eight of 10 patients did not meet ipsilateral lung V20Gy dose constraints (≥35% of lung receiving 20 Gy) in either the free breathing or DIBH plans, whereas 8 out of 10 met lung V20Gy goal constraints (≤30% of lung receiving 20 Gy) in the CPAP-DIBH plans. Based on the outcomes of our study, CPAP could be a strategy for reducing lung and heart dose, both in patients not able to execute DIBH and as an adjunct in those not deriving sufficient dose reduction from DIBH alone.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias da Mama / Neoplasias Unilaterais da Mama Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Female / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Med Dosim Assunto da revista: RADIOTERAPIA Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Mongólia

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias da Mama / Neoplasias Unilaterais da Mama Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Female / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Med Dosim Assunto da revista: RADIOTERAPIA Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Mongólia