Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Low-dose CT with metal artifact reduction in arthroplasty imaging: a cadaveric and clinical study.
Subhas, Naveen; Jun, Bong J; Mehta, Parthiv N; Ricchetti, Eric T; Obuchowski, Nancy A; Primak, Andrew N; Iannotti, Joseph P.
Afiliação
  • Subhas N; Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA. subhasn@ccf.org.
  • Jun BJ; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA.
  • Mehta PN; Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA.
  • Ricchetti ET; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA.
  • Obuchowski NA; Department of Biostatistics, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA.
  • Primak AN; Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc., Malvern, PA, 19355, USA.
  • Iannotti JP; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA.
Skeletal Radiol ; 50(5): 955-965, 2021 May.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33037447
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether a simulated low-dose metal artifact reduction (MAR) CT technique is comparable with a clinical dose MAR technique for shoulder arthroplasty evaluation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two shoulder arthroplasties in cadavers and 25 shoulder arthroplasties in patients were scanned using a clinical dose (140 kVp, 300 qrmAs); cadavers were also scanned at half dose (140 kVp, 150 qrmAs). Images were reconstructed using a MAR CT algorithm at full dose and a noise-insertion algorithm simulating 50% dose reduction. For the actual and simulated half-dose cadaver scans, differences in SD for regions of interest were assessed, and streak artifact near the arthroplasty was graded by 3 blinded readers. Simulated half-dose scans were compared with full-dose scans in patients by measuring differences in implant position and by comparing readers' grades of periprosthetic osteolysis and muscle atrophy. RESULTS: The mean difference in SD between actual and simulated half-dose methods was 2.42 HU (95% CI [1.4, 3.4]). No differences in streak artifact grades were seen in 13/18 (72.2%) comparisons in cadavers. In patients, differences in implant position measurements were within 1° or 1 mm in 149/150 (99.3%) measurements. The inter-reader agreement rates were nearly identical when readers were using full-dose (77.3% [232/300] for osteolysis and 76.9% [173/225] for muscle atrophy) and simulated half-dose (76.7% [920/1200] for osteolysis and 74.0% [666/900] for muscle atrophy) scans. CONCLUSION: A simulated half-dose MAR CT technique is comparable both quantitatively and qualitatively with a standard-dose technique for shoulder arthroplasty evaluation, demonstrating that this technique could be used to reduce dose in arthroplasty imaging.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X / Artefatos Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Skeletal Radiol Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X / Artefatos Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Skeletal Radiol Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos