Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Use and Usefulness of After-Visit Summaries by Language and Health Literacy among Latinx and Chinese Primary Care Patients.
Nouri, Sarah S; Pathak, Sarita; Livaudais-Toman, Jennifer; Gregorich, Steven E; Kaplan, Celia P; Diamond, Lisa; Karliner, Leah.
Afiliação
  • Nouri SS; Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco , San Francisco, California, USA.
  • Pathak S; Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco , San Francisco, California, USA.
  • Livaudais-Toman J; Multiethnic Health Equity Research Center, University of California San Francisco , San Francisco, California, USA.
  • Gregorich SE; Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco , San Francisco, California, USA.
  • Kaplan CP; Multiethnic Health Equity Research Center, University of California San Francisco , San Francisco, California, USA.
  • Diamond L; Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco , San Francisco, California, USA.
  • Karliner L; Multiethnic Health Equity Research Center, University of California San Francisco , San Francisco, California, USA.
J Health Commun ; 25(8): 632-639, 2020 08 02.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33059522
ABSTRACT
The after-visit summary (AVS), a document generated from the electronic health record that summarizes patients' encounters with the healthcare system, is a widely used communication tool. Its use by and usefulness for populations with limited English proficiency (LEP) and limited health literacy (LHL) is poorly understood. In this cross-sectional study, we assessed use and usefulness of the AVS among English-, Spanish-, Cantonese-, or Mandarin-speaking Latinx and Chinese primary-care patients. Outcome measures were self-reported AVS use (did not use/looked-at only/shared only/looked-at and shared) and usefulness (useful/not useful). Among 993 participants, 57% were ≥65 years old, 61% had LEP, 21% had LHL, 30.2% were Latinx, 69.8% were Chinese. The majority used the AVS (86%) and found it useful (65%). In adjusted models, participants with LEP were more likely to "look at" (OR 1.68, 95% CI 1.07-2.62) and "look at and share" (OR 1.65, 1.02-2.66) the AVS, but less likely to find it useful (OR 0.68, 0.47-0.98) compared to English speakers. Those with LHL were less likely to "look at" (OR 0.60, 0.39-0.93) and less likely to find the AVS useful (OR 0.67, 0.46-0.99) compared to those with adequate health literacy. Our results emphasize the need for easy-to-understand and fully language-concordant AVS.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Atenção Primária à Saúde / Asiático / Hispânico ou Latino / Satisfação do Paciente / Letramento em Saúde / Comunicação em Saúde / Idioma Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Health Commun Assunto da revista: SAUDE PUBLICA / SERVICOS DE SAUDE Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Atenção Primária à Saúde / Asiático / Hispânico ou Latino / Satisfação do Paciente / Letramento em Saúde / Comunicação em Saúde / Idioma Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Health Commun Assunto da revista: SAUDE PUBLICA / SERVICOS DE SAUDE Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos