Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Head-up tilt test diagnostic yield in syncope diagnosis.
Barón-Esquivias, Gonzalo; Díaz Martín, Antonio J; Del Castillo, Álvaro Marco; Quintanilla, Macarena; Barón-Solís, Carmen; Morillo, Carlos A.
Afiliação
  • Barón-Esquivias G; Cardiology Department, Virgen del Rocio University Hospital, Seville University, Spain. Electronic address: gonzalo.baron.sspa@juntadeandalucia.es.
  • Díaz Martín AJ; Cardiology Department, Virgen del Rocio University Hospital, Seville University, Spain.
  • Del Castillo ÁM; Cardiology Department, University Hospital Ramon y Cajal, Madrid, Spain.
  • Quintanilla M; Cardiology Department, Virgen del Rocio University Hospital, Seville University, Spain.
  • Barón-Solís C; Cardiology Department, Virgen del Rocio University Hospital, Seville University, Spain.
  • Morillo CA; Department of Cardiac Sciences, Libin Cardiovascular Institute of Alberta, University of Calgary and Population Health Research Institute-McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. Electronic address: carlos.morillo@ucalgary.ca.
J Electrocardiol ; 63: 46-50, 2020.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33075618
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The European Syncope Guidelines (ESG) recommend the use of Head-up tilt test (HUT) in case of suspicion of vasovagal syncope (VVS) or orthostatic hypotensive syncope (OHS) after an adequate initial inconclusive evaluation. We report a single center experience in the scenario of suspected VVS or OHS, who underwent HUT in patients referred to a Syncope Clinic after ruling out high-risk causes.

METHODS:

We prospectively and consecutively included all syncopal patients that were referred for HUT, by their attending physician after performing a series of diagnostic tests to rule out cardiac etiology. The clinical history and diagnostic tests performed were reviewed prior to HUT. Patients were pre-classified according to the recommendations from the ESG as; VVS, OHS or Syncope of Unknown Etiology (SUE).

RESULTS:

We studied 1058 patients, 558 (52.7%) males, mean age 46.5 ±â€¯20.1 yr. There were no gender differences in age, risk factors, previous heart diseases, ECG findings or number of previous tests. Based on the ESG criteria a significant number of diagnostic tests were probably unnecessarily performed. HUT was positive in 609 patients (57.5%). The rate of positive HUT according to pre-classification was significantly different among groups 60% VVS, 46.1% OHS and 54.3% SUE (p = 0.037). Combining ESG recommendations and HUT results of the 1058 resulted in 762 (72%) diagnosed as VVS, 89 (8.4%) as OHS and 207 (19.5%) as SUE.

CONCLUSIONS:

Appropriate application of ESG recommendations combined with HUT, identified 81% of patients with non-cardiogenic syncope, potentially avoiding a significant number of unnecessary diagnostic tests.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Síncope Vasovagal / Eletrocardiografia Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Electrocardiol Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Síncope Vasovagal / Eletrocardiografia Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Electrocardiol Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article