Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparison of cognitive-behavioral therapy and yoga for the treatment of late-life worry: A randomized preference trial.
Brenes, Gretchen A; Divers, Jasmin; Miller, Michael E; Anderson, Andrea; Hargis, Gena; Danhauer, Suzanne C.
Afiliação
  • Brenes GA; Department of Internal Medicine, Section on Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA.
  • Divers J; Department of Biostatistics and Data Science, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA.
  • Miller ME; Department of Biostatistics and Data Science, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA.
  • Anderson A; Department of Biostatistics and Data Science, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA.
  • Hargis G; Department of Internal Medicine, Section on Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA.
  • Danhauer SC; Department of Social Sciences and Health Policy, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA.
Depress Anxiety ; 37(12): 1194-1207, 2020 12.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33107666
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) and yoga on late-life worry, anxiety, and sleep; and examine preference and selection effects on these outcomes.

METHODS:

A randomized preference trial of CBT and yoga was conducted in community-dwelling adults 60 years or older, who scored 26 or above on the Penn State Worry Questionnaire-Abbreviated (PSWQ-A). CBT consisted of 10 weekly telephone sessions. Yoga consisted of 20 biweekly group yoga classes. The primary outcome was worry (PSWQ-A); the secondary outcomes were anxiety (PROMIS-Anxiety) and sleep (Insomnia Severity Index [ISI]). We examined both preference effects (average effect for those who received their preferred intervention [regardless of whether it was CBT or yoga] minus the average for those who did not receive their preferred intervention [regardless of the intervention]) and selection effect (which addresses the question of whether there is a benefit to getting to select one intervention over the other, and measures the effect on outcomes of self-selection to a specific intervention).

RESULTS:

Five hundred older adults were randomized to the randomized trial (125 each in CBT and yoga) or the preference trial (120 chose CBT; 130 chose yoga). In the randomized trial, the intervention effect of yoga compared with CBT adjusted for baseline psychotropic medication use, gender, and race was 1.6 (-0.2, 3.3), p = .08 for the PSWQ-A. Similar results were observed with PROMIS-Anxiety (adjusted intervention effect 0.3 [-1.5, 2.2], p = .71). Participants randomized to CBT experienced a greater reduction in the ISI compared with yoga (adjusted intervention effect 2.4 [1.2, 3.7], p < .01]). Estimated in the combined data set (N = 500), the preference and selection effects were not significant for the PSWQ-A, PROMIS-Anxiety, and ISI. Of the 52 adverse events, only two were possibly related to the intervention. None of the 26 serious adverse events were related to the study interventions.

CONCLUSIONS:

CBT and yoga were both effective at reducing late-life worry and anxiety. However, a greater impact was seen for CBT compared with yoga for improving sleep. Neither preference nor selection effects was found.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Yoga / Terapia Cognitivo-Comportamental Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Limite: Aged / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Depress Anxiety Assunto da revista: PSIQUIATRIA Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Yoga / Terapia Cognitivo-Comportamental Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Limite: Aged / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Depress Anxiety Assunto da revista: PSIQUIATRIA Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos