Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Screening for sickle cell disease in newborns: a systematic review.
Runkel, Britta; Klüppelholz, Birgit; Rummer, Anne; Sieben, Wiebke; Lampert, Ulrike; Bollig, Claudia; Markes, Martina; Paschen, Ulrike; Angelescu, Konstanze.
Afiliação
  • Runkel B; Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care, Cologne, Germany.
  • Klüppelholz B; Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care, Cologne, Germany.
  • Rummer A; Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care, Cologne, Germany.
  • Sieben W; Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care, Cologne, Germany.
  • Lampert U; Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care, Cologne, Germany.
  • Bollig C; Institute for Evidence in Medicine, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
  • Markes M; Cochrane Germany, Cochrane Germany Foundation, Freiburg, Germany.
  • Paschen U; Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care, Cologne, Germany.
  • Angelescu K; Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care, Cologne, Germany.
Syst Rev ; 9(1): 250, 2020 10 30.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33126922
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Sickle cell disease (SCD) is an inherited autosomal recessive disorder caused by the replacement of normal haemoglobin (HbA) by mutant Hb (sickle Hb, HbS). The sickle-shaped red blood cells lead to haemolysis and vaso-occlusion. Especially in the first years of life, patients with SCD are at high risk of life-threatening complications. SCD prevalence shows large regional variations; the disease predominantly occurs in sub-Saharan Africa. We aimed to systematically assess the evidence on the benefit of newborn screening for SCD followed by an earlier treatment start.

METHODS:

We systematically searched bibliographic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Databases, and the Health Technology Assessment Database), trial registries, and other sources to identify systematic reviews and randomised controlled trials (RCTs) or non-randomised trials on newborn screening for SCD. The last search was in 07/2020. Two reviewers independently reviewed abstracts and full-text articles and assessed the risk of bias of the studies included. Data were extracted by one person and checked by another. As meta-analyses were not possible, a qualitative summary of results was performed.

RESULTS:

We identified 1 eligible study with direct evidence a Jamaican retrospective study evaluating newborn screening for SCD followed by preventive measures (prevention of infections and education of parents). The study included 500 patients with SCD (intervention group, 395; historical control group, 105). Although the results showed a high risk of bias, the difference between the intervention and the control group was very large mortality in children decreased by a factor of about 10 in the first 5 years of life (0.02% in the intervention group vs. 0.19% in the control group, odds ratio 0.09; 95% confidence interval [0.04; 0.22], p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION:

The results are based on a single retrospective study including historical controls. However, the decrease of mortality by a factor of 10 is unlikely to be explained by bias alone. Therefore, in terms of mortality, data from this single retrospective study included in our systematic review suggest a benefit of newborn screening for SCD (followed by preventive measures) versus no newborn screening for SCD (weak certainty of conclusions).
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Anemia Falciforme Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Health_technology_assessment / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Risk_factors_studies / Screening_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Child / Humans / Newborn Idioma: En Revista: Syst Rev Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Alemanha

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Anemia Falciforme Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Health_technology_assessment / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Risk_factors_studies / Screening_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Child / Humans / Newborn Idioma: En Revista: Syst Rev Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Alemanha