Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Validation of the G8 screening tool in older patients with cancer considered for surgical treatment.
Bruijnen, Cheryl P; Heijmer, Anne; van Harten-Krouwel, Diny G; van den Bos, Frederiek; de Bree, Remco; Witteveen, Petronella O; Emmelot-Vonk, Mariëlle H.
Afiliação
  • Bruijnen CP; Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands. Electronic address: c.p.bruijnen@umcutrecht.nl.
  • Heijmer A; Department of Geriatrics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
  • van Harten-Krouwel DG; Department of Geriatrics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
  • van den Bos F; Department of Geriatrics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
  • de Bree R; Department of Head and Neck Surgical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
  • Witteveen PO; Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
  • Emmelot-Vonk MH; Department of Geriatrics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
J Geriatr Oncol ; 12(5): 793-798, 2021 06.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33172806
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The Geriatric 8 (G8) has proven to be one of the most sensitive frailty-screening tools for older patients with cancer undergoing systemic treatment. In this study we validated whether the G8 is also suitable for identifying impairments in their comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) in older patients with cancer undergoing surgery. Thereby, we investigated the differences in postoperative outcomes between the fit and frail patients classified by the G8.

METHODS:

Patients ≥70 years with a surgery indication because of a (suspected) malignant disease were prospectively enrolled. In all patients, a CGA was performed. The G8 results were assessed in parallel. The diagnostic value of the G8 was determined by comparing the result with the CGA as a reference test. Deficits in CGA was defined as ≥ two impairments of the CGA. Postoperative complications were retrospectively obtained from the medical record and compared between the fit and frail patients.

RESULTS:

In total, 143 patients were enrolled. The sensitivity, specificity, and negative predictive value of the G8 were 82% (95% CI 70-91), 63% (95% CI 52-73), and 85% (95% CI 75-91). In the patients with an impaired G8, a significantly prolonged hospital stay, higher rate of delirium, and higher 1-year mortality rate were seen.

CONCLUSION:

The G8 is a simple and useful screening tool for identifying deficits in CGA in older patients with cancer requiring surgery. Second, we concluded that patients with an impaired G8 are more at risk for a complicated recovery from surgery.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Fragilidade / Neoplasias Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Screening_studies Limite: Aged / Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Geriatr Oncol Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Fragilidade / Neoplasias Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Screening_studies Limite: Aged / Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Geriatr Oncol Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article