Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
First Real-World Effectiveness Analysis of Preschool Peanut Oral Immunotherapy.
Soller, Lianne; Abrams, Elissa M; Carr, Stuart; Kapur, Sandeep; Rex, Gregory A; Leo, Sara; McHenry, Mary; Vander Leek, Timothy K; Yeung, Joanne; Cook, Victoria E; Wong, Tiffany; Hildebrand, Kyla J; Mak, Raymond; Gerstner, Thomas V; Cameron, Scott B; Chan, Edmond S.
Afiliação
  • Soller L; British Columbia Children's Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada; Division of Allergy and Immunology, Department of Pediatrics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada. Electronic address: lsoller@bcchr.ca.
  • Abrams EM; Division of Allergy and Immunology, Department of Pediatrics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada; Department of Pediatrics, Section of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada; Meadowood Medical Center, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
  • Carr S; Pediatric Allergy & Asthma, Department of Pediatrics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
  • Kapur S; Division of Allergy, Department of Pediatrics, Dalhousie University/IWK Health Centre, Halifax, NS, Canada; Halifax Allergy & Asthma Associates, Halifax, NS, Canada.
  • Rex GA; Division of Allergy, Department of Pediatrics, Dalhousie University/IWK Health Centre, Halifax, NS, Canada; Halifax Allergy & Asthma Associates, Halifax, NS, Canada.
  • Leo S; Division of Allergy and Immunology, Department of Pediatrics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada; West Coast Allergy and Immunology Clinic, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
  • McHenry M; Division of Allergy, Department of Pediatrics, Dalhousie University/IWK Health Centre, Halifax, NS, Canada; Halifax Allergy & Asthma Associates, Halifax, NS, Canada.
  • Vander Leek TK; Pediatric Allergy & Asthma, Department of Pediatrics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada; Pediatric Allergy & Immunology, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
  • Yeung J; Division of Allergy and Immunology, Department of Pediatrics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada; Vancouver Pediatric and Allergy Centre, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
  • Cook VE; Division of Allergy and Immunology, Department of Pediatrics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada; Community Allergy Clinic, Victoria, BC, Canada.
  • Wong T; British Columbia Children's Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada; Division of Allergy and Immunology, Department of Pediatrics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
  • Hildebrand KJ; British Columbia Children's Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada; Division of Allergy and Immunology, Department of Pediatrics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
  • Mak R; Division of Allergy and Immunology, Department of Pediatrics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
  • Gerstner TV; Department of Pediatrics, Section of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada; Meadowood Medical Center, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
  • Cameron SB; Division of Allergy and Immunology, Department of Pediatrics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada; Community Allergy Clinic, Victoria, BC, Canada.
  • Chan ES; British Columbia Children's Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada; Division of Allergy and Immunology, Department of Pediatrics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract ; 9(3): 1349-1356.e1, 2021 03.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33221274
BACKGROUND: We previously described safety of preschool peanut oral immunotherapy (P-OIT) in a real-world setting; 0.4% of patients experienced a severe reaction, and 4.1% received epinephrine, during build-up. OBJECTIVE: To determine the effectiveness of preschool P-OIT after 1 year of maintenance. METHODS: Preschoolers (9-70 months) with at least 1 objective reaction to peanut (during baseline oral food challenge (OFC) or P-OIT build-up) received a follow-up OFC to cumulative 4000 mg protein after 1 year on 300 mg peanut daily maintenance. Effectiveness of desensitization was defined as proportion of patients with a negative follow-up OFC. Symptoms and treatment at follow-up OFC were recorded. RESULTS: Of the 117 patients who successfully completed 1 year of P-OIT and subsequently underwent a cumulative 4000-mg follow-up OFC, 92 (78.6%) had a negative OFC and 115 (98.3%) tolerated a cumulative dose of greater than or equal to 1000 mg. For the 25 (21.4%) who reacted, their threshold increased by 3376 mg (95% CI, 2884-3868) from baseline to follow-up; 17 (14.5%) patients experienced grade 1 reactions, 7 (6.00%) grade 2, and 1 (0.85%) grade 3. Two patients (1.71%) received epinephrine associated with P-OIT, and 1 (0.85%) went to the emergency department. CONCLUSIONS: Our data demonstrate that real-world preschool P-OIT is effective after 1 year of maintenance for those who received a follow-up OFC. For those who reacted, their threshold increased sufficiently to protect against accidental exposures. P-OIT should be considered for preschoolers as an alternative to current recommendations to avoid peanut.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Arachis / Hipersensibilidade a Amendoim Tipo de estudo: Guideline Limite: Child, preschool / Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Arachis / Hipersensibilidade a Amendoim Tipo de estudo: Guideline Limite: Child, preschool / Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article