Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
What patients want to know, and what we actually tell them: The ABIDE project.
Fruijtier, Agnetha D; Visser, Leonie N C; Bouwman, Femke H; Lutz, Rogier; Schoonenboom, Niki; Kalisvaart, Kees; Hempenius, Liesbeth; Roks, Gerwin; Boelaarts, Leo; Claus, Jules J; Kleijer, Mariska; de Beer, Marlijn; van der Flier, Wiesje M; Smets, Ellen M A.
Afiliação
  • Fruijtier AD; Department of Neurology Alzheimer Center Amsterdam Amsterdam Neuroscience Amsterdam UMC Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam Amsterdam the Netherlands.
  • Visser LNC; Department of Medical Psychology Academic Medical Center Amsterdam UMC Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute Amsterdam the Netherlands.
  • Bouwman FH; Department of Neurology Alzheimer Center Amsterdam Amsterdam Neuroscience Amsterdam UMC Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam Amsterdam the Netherlands.
  • Lutz R; Department of Medical Psychology Academic Medical Center Amsterdam UMC Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute Amsterdam the Netherlands.
  • Schoonenboom N; Department of Neurology Alzheimer Center Amsterdam Amsterdam Neuroscience Amsterdam UMC Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam Amsterdam the Netherlands.
  • Kalisvaart K; Department of Neurology Alzheimer Center Amsterdam Amsterdam Neuroscience Amsterdam UMC Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam Amsterdam the Netherlands.
  • Hempenius L; Department of Clinical Geriatrics Spaarne Gasthuis Haarlem the Netherlands.
  • Roks G; Department of Clinical Geriatrics Spaarne Gasthuis Haarlem the Netherlands.
  • Boelaarts L; Geriatric Center Medical Center Leeuwarden Leeuwarden the Netherlands.
  • Claus JJ; Department of Neurology ETZ Hospital Tilburg the Netherlands.
  • Kleijer M; Geriatric Department NoordWest Ziekenhuis Groep Alkmaar the Netherlands.
  • de Beer M; Department of Neurology Tergooi Hospital, Blaricum the Netherlands.
  • van der Flier WM; Department of Neurology LangeLand Ziekenhuis Zoetermeer the Netherlands.
  • Smets EMA; Department of Neurology Reinier de Graaf Gasthuis Delft the Netherlands.
Alzheimers Dement (N Y) ; 6(1): e12113, 2020.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33344753
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

We studied to what degree and at whose initiative 25 informational topics, formerly identified as important, are discussed in diagnostic consultations.

METHODS:

Audio recordings of clinician-patient consultations of 71 patients and 32 clinicians, collected in eight Dutch memory clinics, were independently content-coded by two coders. The coding scheme encompassed 25 informational topics.

RESULTS:

Approximately half (Mdn = 12) of the 25 topics were discussed per patient during the diagnostic process, with a higher frequency among individuals receiving a dementia diagnosis (Mdn = 14) compared to others (Mdn = 11). Individual topics ranged from being discussed with 2/71 (3%) to 70/71 (99%) of patients. Patients and/or care partners rarely initiated topic discussion (10%). When they did, they often enquired about one of the least frequently addressed topics.

CONCLUSION:

Most patients received information on approximately half of the important informational topics. Providing the topic list to patients and care partners beforehand could allow consultation preparation and stimulate participation.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Alzheimers Dement (N Y) Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Alzheimers Dement (N Y) Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article