Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Teaching life cycle assessment in higher education.
Viere, Tobias; Amor, Ben; Berger, Nicolas; Fanous, Ruba Dolfing; Arduin, Rachel Horta; Keller, Regula; Laurent, Alexis; Loubet, Philippe; Strothmann, Philip; Weyand, Steffi; Wright, Laurie; Sonnemann, Guido.
Afiliação
  • Viere T; Institute for Industrial Ecology (INEC), Pforzheim University, Pforzheim, Germany.
  • Amor B; Interdisciplinary Research Laboratory in Life Cycle Assessment and Circular Economy (LIRIDE), Université de Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada.
  • Berger N; ISM, UMR 5255, Université de Bordeaux, Talence, France.
  • Fanous RD; PRé Sustainability B.V, Amersfoort, Netherlands.
  • Arduin RH; ISM, UMR 5255, Université de Bordeaux, Talence, France.
  • Keller R; Institute of Natural Resource Sciences, Zurich University of Applied Sciences, Wädenswil, Switzerland.
  • Laurent A; Section for Quantitative Sustainability Assessment, Technical University of Denmark (DTU), Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark.
  • Loubet P; ISM, UMR 5255, Université de Bordeaux, Talence, France.
  • Strothmann P; Forum for Sustainability Through Life Cycle Innovation e.V. (FSLCI), Berlin, Germany.
  • Weyand S; Institute IWAR, Material Flow and Resource Economy, Technical University of Darmstadt, Darmstadt, Germany.
  • Wright L; Solent University Southampton, Southampton, UK.
  • Sonnemann G; ISM, UMR 5255, Université de Bordeaux, Talence, France.
Int J Life Cycle Assess ; 26(3): 511-527, 2021.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33349738
ABSTRACT

Purpose:

Scientific Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) literature provides some examples of LCA teaching in higher education, but not a structured overview of LCA teaching contents and related competencies. Hence this paper aims at assessing and highlighting trends in LCA learning outcomes, teaching approaches and developed content used to equip graduates for their future professional practices in sustainability.

Methods:

Based on a literature review on teaching LCA in higher education and a collaborative consensus building approach through expert group panel discussions, an overview of LCA learning and competency levels with related teaching contents and corresponding workload is developed. The levels are built on the European Credit Transfer and Accumulation System (ECTS) and Bloom's taxonomy of learning. Results and

discussion:

The paper frames five LCA learning and competency levels that differ in terms of study program integration, workload, cognitive domain categories, learning outcomes, and envisioned professional skills. It furthermore provides insights into teaching approaches and content, including software use, related to these levels. Conclusions and

recommendations:

This paper encourages and supports higher educational bodies to implement a minimum of 'life cycle literacy' into students' curriculum across various domains by increasing the availability, visibility and quality of their teaching on life cycle thinking and LCA.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Qualitative_research Idioma: En Revista: Int J Life Cycle Assess Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Alemanha

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Qualitative_research Idioma: En Revista: Int J Life Cycle Assess Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Alemanha