Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Quality and Reliability of YouTube for Patient Information on Neurotoxins.
Patel, Manish; Patel, Mit M; Cristel, Robert T.
Afiliação
  • Patel M; College of Medicine, University of Illinois at Chicago College of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.
  • Patel MM; School of Medicine, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan.
  • Cristel RT; Department of Otolaryngology, University of Illinois at Chicago College of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.
Facial Plast Surg ; 36(6): 773-777, 2020 Dec.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33368135
ABSTRACT
YouTube is a common source of medical information for patients. This is the first study to assess the reliability and educational value of YouTube videos on neurotoxin procedures. YouTube.com was searched on June 15, 2020 using the keyword "Botox" or "neurotoxin." A total of 100 videos were reviewed. Sixty-one videos met the inclusion criteria and were included in the final analysis. Video characteristics were noted, and a score was assigned to each video using the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) benchmark criteria and the Global Quality Score (GQS) to measure source reliability and educational value, respectively. A total of 61 videos that met the inclusion criteria had an average length of 589 seconds (9 minutes and 49 seconds), 210,673 views, 5,295 likes, 318 dislikes, and 478 comments. A total of 30 videos (49%) were posted with an intention to educate patients while 31 videos (51%) were posted with the intention to detail a personal experience with neurotoxin. Patient education videos were significantly more reliable (P JAMA< 0.001) and had more educational value (P GQS < 0.001) but were less popular than "personal experience videos." Personal-experience videos posted by patients had higher popularity, more likes and comments, yet lower scores on reliability and education. Patients will continue to seek educational material online, and clinicians should utilize this information to help primarily educate patients with standardized and accurate information about their treatment. KEY POINTS · Question Are YouTube videos pertaining to neurotoxin reliable and contain useful information to educate patients to make informed decisions about their neurotoxin treatment?. ·

Findings:

Roughly half of videos reviewed were vlogs (video logs), which were of low quality and educational value, but were more popular compared with videos that were intended to educate patients on neurotoxin treatment.. · Meaning Patients who use YouTube as a source of information about neurotoxin treatment may be misled with inaccurate and unreliable information. Physicians must be aware of these findings to properly educate patients with standardized and accurate information about their treatment..
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Mídias Sociais / Neurotoxinas Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Facial Plast Surg Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Mídias Sociais / Neurotoxinas Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Facial Plast Surg Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article