Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Are capuchin monkeys (Sapajus spp.) sensitive to lost opportunities? The role of opportunity costs in intertemporal choice.
Addessi, Elsa; Tierno, Valeria; Focaroli, Valentina; Rossi, Federica; Gastaldi, Serena; De Petrillo, Francesca; Paglieri, Fabio; Stevens, Jeffrey R.
Afiliação
  • Addessi E; Unità di Primatologia Cognitiva e Centro Primati, Istituto di Scienze e Tecnologie della Cognizione, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Rome, Italy.
  • Tierno V; Unità di Primatologia Cognitiva e Centro Primati, Istituto di Scienze e Tecnologie della Cognizione, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Rome, Italy.
  • Focaroli V; Department of Psychology, Sapienza Università di Roma, Rome, Italy.
  • Rossi F; Unità di Primatologia Cognitiva e Centro Primati, Istituto di Scienze e Tecnologie della Cognizione, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Rome, Italy.
  • Gastaldi S; Laboratory of Developmental Neuroscience, Università Campus Biomedico, Rome, Italy.
  • De Petrillo F; Unità di Primatologia Cognitiva e Centro Primati, Istituto di Scienze e Tecnologie della Cognizione, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Rome, Italy.
  • Paglieri F; Unità di Primatologia Cognitiva e Centro Primati, Istituto di Scienze e Tecnologie della Cognizione, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Rome, Italy.
  • Stevens JR; Unità di Primatologia Cognitiva e Centro Primati, Istituto di Scienze e Tecnologie della Cognizione, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Rome, Italy.
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci ; 376(1819): 20190674, 2021 03.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33423635
ABSTRACT
Principles of economics predict that the costs associated with obtaining rewards can influence choice. When individuals face choices between a smaller, immediate option and a larger, later option, they often experience opportunity costs associated with waiting for delayed rewards because they must forego the opportunity to make other choices. We evaluated how reducing opportunity costs affects delay tolerance in capuchin monkeys. After choosing the larger option, in the High cost condition, subjects had to wait for the delay to expire, whereas in the Low cost different and Low cost same conditions, they could perform a new choice during the delay. To control for the effect of intake rate on choices, the Low cost same condition had the same intake rate ratio as the High cost condition. We found that capuchins attended both to intake rates and to opportunity costs. They chose the larger option more often in the Low cost different and Low cost same conditions than in the High cost condition, and more often in the Low cost different condition than in the Low cost same condition. Understanding how non-human primates represent and use costs in making decisions not only helps to develop theoretical frameworks to explain their choices but also addresses similarities with and differences from human decision-making. These outcomes provide insights into the origins of human economic behaviour. This article is part of the theme issue 'Existence and prevalence of economic behaviours among non-human primates'.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Recompensa / Comportamento de Escolha / Sapajus Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Health_economic_evaluation / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Animals Idioma: En Revista: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Itália

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Recompensa / Comportamento de Escolha / Sapajus Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Health_economic_evaluation / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Animals Idioma: En Revista: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Itália