Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Revised version (INFD-D-20-00242): impact of 16S rDNA sequencing on clinical treatment decisions: a single center retrospective study.
Ursenbach, Axel; Schramm, Frédéric; Séverac, François; Hansmann, Yves; Lefebvre, Nicolas; Ruch, Yvon; Argemi, Xavier.
Afiliação
  • Ursenbach A; Laboratoire de bactériologie, Faculté de Médecine, Université de Strasbourg, 3 rue Koeberlé, 67000, Strasbourg, France. ursenbach.axel@gmail.com.
  • Schramm F; Laboratoire de bactériologie, Faculté de Médecine, Université de Strasbourg, 3 rue Koeberlé, 67000, Strasbourg, France.
  • Séverac F; Service de Santé Publique, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
  • Hansmann Y; Maladies Infectieuses et Tropicales, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
  • Lefebvre N; Maladies Infectieuses et Tropicales, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
  • Ruch Y; Maladies Infectieuses et Tropicales, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
  • Argemi X; Maladies Infectieuses et Tropicales, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
BMC Infect Dis ; 21(1): 190, 2021 Feb 18.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33602178
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

PCRs targeting 16S ribosomal DNA (16S PCR) followed by Sanger's sequencing can identify bacteria from normally sterile sites and complement standard analyzes, but they are expensive. We conducted a retrospective study in the Strasbourg University Hospital to assess the clinical impact of 16S PCR sequencing on patients' treatments according to different sample types.

METHODS:

From 2014 to 2018, 806 16S PCR samples were processed, and 191 of those were positive.

RESULTS:

Overall, the test impacted the treatment of 62 of the 191 patients (32%). The antibiotic treatment was rationalized in 31 patients (50%) and extended in 24 patients (39%), and an invasive procedure was chosen for 7 patients (11%) due to the 16S PCR sequencing results. Positive 16S PCR sequencing results on cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) had a greater impact on patients' management than positive ones on cardiac valves (p = 0.044). The clinical impact of positive 16S PCR sequencing results were significantly higher when blood cultures were negative (p < 0.001), and this difference appeared larger when both blood and sample cultures were negative (p < 0.001). The diagnostic contribution of 16S PCR was higher in patients with previous antibiotic treatment (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION:

In all, 16S PCR analysis has a significant clinical impact on patient management, particularly for suspected CSF infections, for patients with culture-negative samples and for those with previous antibiotic treatments.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Infecções Bacterianas / RNA Ribossômico 16S / Técnicas de Diagnóstico Molecular / Tomada de Decisão Clínica Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: BMC Infect Dis Assunto da revista: DOENCAS TRANSMISSIVEIS Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: França

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Infecções Bacterianas / RNA Ribossômico 16S / Técnicas de Diagnóstico Molecular / Tomada de Decisão Clínica Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: BMC Infect Dis Assunto da revista: DOENCAS TRANSMISSIVEIS Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: França