The use of personal health information outside the circle of care: consent preferences of patients from an academic health care institution.
BMC Med Ethics
; 22(1): 29, 2021 03 24.
Article
em En
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-33761938
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND:
Immense volumes of personal health information (PHI) are required to realize the anticipated benefits of artificial intelligence in clinical medicine. To maintain public trust in medical research, consent policies must evolve to reflect contemporary patient preferences.METHODS:
Patients were invited to complete a 27-item survey focusing on (a) broad versus specific consent; (b) opt-in versus opt-out approaches; (c) comfort level sharing with different recipients; (d) attitudes towards commercialization; and (e) options to track PHI use and study results.RESULTS:
222 participants were included in the analysis; 83% were comfortable sharing PHI with researchers at their own hospital, although younger patients (≤ 49 years) were more uncomfortable than older patients (50 + years; 13% versus 2% uncomfortable, p < 0.05). While 56% of patients preferred broad consent, 38% preferred specific consent; 6% preferred not sharing at all. The majority of patients (63%) preferred to be asked for permission before entry into a contact pool. Again, this trend was more pronounced for younger patients (≤ 49 years 76%). Approximately half of patients were uncomfortable sharing PHI with commercial enterprises (51% uncomfortable, 27% comfortable, 22% neutral). Most patients preferred to track PHI usage (61%), with the highest proportion once again reported by the youngest patients (≤ 49 years 71%). A majority of patients also wished to be notified regarding study results (70%).CONCLUSIONS:
While most patients were willing to share their PHI with researchers within their own institution, many preferred a transparent and reciprocal consent process. These data also suggest a generational shift, wherein younger patients preferred more specific consent options. Modernizing consent policies to reflect increased autonomy is crucial in fostering sustained public engagement with medical research.Palavras-chave
Texto completo:
1
Base de dados:
MEDLINE
Assunto principal:
Inteligência Artificial
/
Registros de Saúde Pessoal
Limite:
Humans
Idioma:
En
Revista:
BMC Med Ethics
Assunto da revista:
ETICA
Ano de publicação:
2021
Tipo de documento:
Article
País de afiliação:
Canadá