Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Clinical characteristics and outcomes of splenic infarction in cancer patients: a retrospective, single center report of 206 cases.
Bewersdorf, Jan Philipp; Parmar, Nishita; Israel, Gary M; Gettinger, Scott N; Lee, Alfred Ian.
Afiliação
  • Bewersdorf JP; Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Hematology, Yale University School of Medicine, 333 Cedar Street, PO Box 208028, New Haven, CT, 06520-8028, USA.
  • Parmar N; Department of Radiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
  • Israel GM; Department of Radiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
  • Gettinger SN; Department of Medicine, Section of Medical Oncology, Smilow Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
  • Lee AI; Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Hematology, Yale University School of Medicine, 333 Cedar Street, PO Box 208028, New Haven, CT, 06520-8028, USA. Alfred.lee@yale.edu.
J Thromb Thrombolysis ; 52(3): 854-862, 2021 Oct.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33765243
ABSTRACT
Cancer patients have a high risk of thromboembolic events including splenic infarct (SI). However, risk factors for SI in cancer patients are poorly understood, and the utility of systemic anticoagulation in such patients is uncertain. We performed a retrospective cohort study of all cancer patients with SI treated at Yale New Haven Hospital from 2008 to 2017. Central review of radiology imaging was performed to confirm the diagnosis of SI. Baseline differences in variables among patients with and without recurrent SI were compared using Fisher's exact test, Pearson's χ2 test, and t-test. Multivariable regression models were conducted to identify factors associated with recurrent SI. Of 206 patients with cancer and SI, 42 had a prior venous thromboembolic event, while 29 had atrial fibrillation/flutter. At a median follow-up of 11.4 months (range 0-142.3 months), 152 patients underwent follow-up imaging, with only 6 having recurrent SI. The use of anticoagulation after initial SI was associated with a nonsignificant increase in recurrent SI (p = 0.054) and was not associated with development of venous thromboembolism after SI (p = 0.414). In bivariate analyses, the risk of recurrent SI showed a significant association with lower platelet counts (p < 0.001) and with atrial fibrillation/flutter (p = 0.036). In a multivariable logistic regression model, no variables were identified that were associated with a higher risk of recurrent SI. SI in cancer patients is typically an isolated event with low recurrence risk. Anticoagulation use should be guided by other thromboembolic risk factors.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Fibrilação Atrial / Infarto do Baço / Tromboembolia Venosa / Neoplasias Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Thromb Thrombolysis Assunto da revista: ANGIOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Fibrilação Atrial / Infarto do Baço / Tromboembolia Venosa / Neoplasias Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Thromb Thrombolysis Assunto da revista: ANGIOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos