Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mainstreaming informed consent for genomic sequencing: A call for action.
Bunnik, Eline M; Dondorp, Wybo J; Bredenoord, Annelien L; de Wert, Guido; Cornel, Martina C.
Afiliação
  • Bunnik EM; Erasmus MC, Department of Medical Ethics, Philosophy and History of Medicine, PO Box 2040, 3000, CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. Electronic address: e.bunnik@erasmusmc.nl.
  • Dondorp WJ; Maastricht University, Dept of Health, Ethics and Society, CAPHRI School for Public Health and Primary Care, PO Box 616, 6200, MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands. Electronic address: w.dondorp@maastrichtuniversity.nl.
  • Bredenoord AL; University Medical Center Utrecht, Julius Center, Department of Medical Humanities, PO Box 85500, 3508, GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands. Electronic address: A.L.Bredenoord@umcutrecht.nl.
  • de Wert G; Maastricht University, Dept of Health, Ethics and Society, CAPHRI School for Public Health and Primary Care, PO Box 616, 6200, MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands. Electronic address: g.dewert@maastrichtuniversity.nl.
  • Cornel MC; Amsterdam University Medical Centre, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Clinical Genetics, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, BS7 Mail G102, PO Box 7057, 1007, MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Electronic address: mc.cornel@amsterdamumc.nl.
Eur J Cancer ; 148: 405-410, 2021 05.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33784533
The wider availability of genomic sequencing, notably gene panels, in cancer care allows for personalised medicine or the tailoring of clinical management to the genetic characteristics of tumours. While the primary aim of mainstream genomic sequencing of cancer patients is therapy-focussed, genomic testing may yield three types of results beyond the answer to the clinical question: suspected germline mutations, variants of uncertain significance (VUS), and unsolicited findings pertaining to other conditions. Ideally, patients should be prepared beforehand for the clinical and psychosocial consequences of such findings, for themselves and for their family members, and be given the opportunity to autonomously decide whether or not to receive such unsolicited genomic information. When genomic tests are mainstreamed into cancer care, so should accompanying informed consent practices. This paper outlines what mainstream oncologists may learn from the ethical tradition of informed consent for genomic sequencing, as developed within clinical genetics. It argues that mainstream informed consent practices should focus on preparing patients for three types of unsolicited outcomes, briefly and effectively. Also, it argues that when the chance of unsolicited findings is very low, opt-out options need not be actively offered. The use of a layered approach - integrated in information systems - should render informed consent feasible for non-geneticist clinicians in mainstream settings. (Inter) national guidelines for mainstreaming informed consent for genomic sequencing must be developed.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Testes Genéticos / Mutação em Linhagem Germinativa / Genômica / Tomada de Decisões / Medicina de Precisão / Consentimento Livre e Esclarecido / Neoplasias Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Eur J Cancer Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Testes Genéticos / Mutação em Linhagem Germinativa / Genômica / Tomada de Decisões / Medicina de Precisão / Consentimento Livre e Esclarecido / Neoplasias Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Eur J Cancer Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article