Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Stand-Alone Posterior Expandable Cage Technique for Adjacent Segment Degeneration with Lumbar Spinal Canal Stenosis: A Retrospective Case Series.
Choi, Woo-Jin; Kim, Seung-Kook; Alaraj, Manhal; Kim, Hyeun-Sung; Lee, Su-Chan.
Afiliação
  • Choi WJ; Department of Neurosurgery, Spine Center, Hurisarang Hospital, 618 Gyeryong-ro, Seo-gu, Daejeon 35299, Korea.
  • Kim SK; Himchan and UHS Spine and Joint Centre, Neurosurgery, University Hospital Sharjah, University Street 1, Sharjah 72772, United Arab Emirates.
  • Alaraj M; Department of Pharmaceutical Medicine and Regulatory Sciences, College of Medicine and Pharmacy, Yonsei University, 85, Songdokwahak-ro, Yeonsu-gu, Incheon 21983, Korea.
  • Kim HS; Joint and Arthritis Research, Orthopaedic Surgery, Himchan Hospital, 20, Sinmok-ro, Yangcheon-gu, Seoul 07999, Korea.
  • Lee SC; Himchan and UHS Spine and Joint Centre, Neurosurgery, University Hospital Sharjah, University Street 1, Sharjah 72772, United Arab Emirates.
Medicina (Kaunas) ; 57(3)2021 Mar 04.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33806505
Background and Objectives: Symptomatic adjacent segment degeneration (ASD) with lumbar spinal canal stenosis (LSCS) is a common complication after spinal intervention, particularly interbody fusion. Stand-alone posterior expandable cages enable interbody fusion with preservation of the previous operation site, and screw-related complications are avoided. Thus, the aim of this study was to investigate the clinicoradiologic outcomes of stand-alone posterior expandable cages for ASD with LSCS. Materials and Methods: Patients with persistent neurologic symptoms and radiologically confirmed ASD with LSCS were evaluated between January 2011 and December 2016. The five-year follow-up data were used to evaluate the long-term outcomes. The radiologic parameters for sagittal balance, pain control (visual analogue scale), disability (Oswestry Disability Index), and early (peri-operative) and late (implant) complications were evaluated. Results: The data of 19 patients with stand-alone posterior expandable cages were evaluated. Local factors, such as intervertebral and foraminal heights, were significantly corrected (p < 0.01 and p < 0.01, respectively), and revision was not reported. The pain level (p < 0.01) and disability rate (p < 0.01) significantly improved, and the early complication rate was low (n = 2, 10.52%). However, lumbar lordosis (p = 0.62) and sagittal balance (p = 0.80) did not significantly improve. Furthermore, the rates of subsidence (n = 4, 21.05%) and retropulsion (n = 3, 15.79%) were high. Conclusions: A stand-alone expandable cage technique should only be considered for older adults and patients with previous extensive fusion. Although this technique is less invasive, improves the local radiologic factors, and yields favorable clinical outcomes with low revision rates, it does not improve the sagittal balance. For more widespread application, the strength of the cage material and high subsidence rates should be improved.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Fusão Vertebral Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies Limite: Aged / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Medicina (Kaunas) Assunto da revista: MEDICINA Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Fusão Vertebral Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies Limite: Aged / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Medicina (Kaunas) Assunto da revista: MEDICINA Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article