Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Investigating feasibility and preliminary efficacy of a simulator-based driving intervention for people with acquired brain injury: A randomised controlled pilot study.
Dimech-Betancourt, Bleydy; Ponsford, Jennie L; Charlton, Judith L; Ross, Pamela E; Gooden, James R; Stolwyk, Renerus J.
Afiliação
  • Dimech-Betancourt B; School of Psychological Sciences, Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
  • Ponsford JL; Monash-Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
  • Charlton JL; School of Psychological Sciences, Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
  • Ross PE; Monash-Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
  • Gooden JR; Epworth Rehabilitation, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
  • Stolwyk RJ; Monash University Accident Research Centre, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Clin Rehabil ; 35(9): 1277-1289, 2021 Sep.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33810776
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the feasibility and preliminary efficacy of a driving simulator intervention on driving outcomes following acquired brain injury. DESIGN: Pilot randomised controlled trial. SETTING: Occupational therapy driver assessment and rehabilitation service. SUBJECTS: Individuals post-acquired brain injury aiming to return to driving. INTERVENTION: Eight sessions of simulated driver training over four weeks, in addition to usual care. Control: Usual care only. MAIN MEASURES: Feasibility outcomes: Participant recruitment and retention; data completeness; therapy attendance and fidelity; adverse events. Performance outcomes: on-road driving performance; Simulator Sickness Questionnaire; Brain Injury Driving Self-Awareness Measure and Driving Comfort Scale - Daytime, assessed at baseline and five weeks post-randomisation. RESULTS: Out of 523 individuals screened, 22 (4%) were recruited and randomised, with 20 completing their allocated group (n = 12 Simulator, n = 8 Usual Care). For those who completed training, session attendance was 100% with simulator sickness rated, on average, as mild. Six individuals (50%) in the Simulator group failed the on-road assessment, versus two (25%) in the Usual Care group (P = 0.373). On average, the Simulator group reported a positive change in confidence ratings (M = 5.77, SD = 13.96) compared to the Usual Care group, who reported a negative change (M = -6.97, SD = 8.47), P = 0.034. The Simulator group (M = 0.67, SD = 3.34) demonstrated no significant change in self-awareness relative to the Usual Care group (M = -0.83, SD = 1.83, P = 0.325). CONCLUSIONS: With adjustments to inclusion criteria and recruitment strategies, it may be feasible to deliver the intervention and conduct a larger trial. There is potential benefit of simulator training for improving driver confidence after acquired brain injury.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Projetos de Pesquisa / Lesões Encefálicas Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Clin Rehabil Assunto da revista: REABILITACAO Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Austrália

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Projetos de Pesquisa / Lesões Encefálicas Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Clin Rehabil Assunto da revista: REABILITACAO Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Austrália