Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Performance of a HER2 testing algorithm specific for p53-abnormal endometrial cancer.
Vermij, Lisa; Singh, Naveena; Leon-Castillo, Alicia; Horeweg, Nanda; Oosting, Jan; Carlson, Joseph; Smit, Vincent; Gilks, Blake; Bosse, Tjalling.
Afiliação
  • Vermij L; Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
  • Singh N; Department of Pathology, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK.
  • Leon-Castillo A; Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
  • Horeweg N; Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
  • Oosting J; Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
  • Carlson J; Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
  • Smit V; Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
  • Gilks B; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
  • Bosse T; Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Histopathology ; 79(4): 533-543, 2021 Oct.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33835523
ABSTRACT

AIMS:

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) amplification in endometrial cancer (EC) is almost completely confined to the p53-abnormal (p53abn) molecular subtype and independent of histological subtype. HER2 testing should therefore be molecular subtype-directed. However, the most optimal approach for HER2 testing in EC has not been fully established. Therefore, we developed an EC-specific HER2 immunohistochemistry (IHC) scoring method and evaluated its reproducibility and performance to establish an optimal diagnostic HER2 testing algorithm for p53abn EC. METHODS AND

RESULTS:

HER2 IHC slides of 78 p53abn EC were scored by six gynaecopathologists according to predefined EC-specific IHC scoring criteria. Interobserver agreement was calculated using Fleiss' kappa and the first-order agreement coefficient (AC1). The consensus IHC score was compared with HER2 dual in-situ hybridisation (DISH) results. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated. A substantial interobserver agreement was found using three- or two-tiered scoring [κ = 0.675, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.633-0.717; AC1 = 0.723, 95% CI = 0.643-0.804 and κ = 0.771, 95% CI = 0.714-0.828; AC1 = 0.774, 95% CI = 0.684-0.865, respectively]. Sensitivity and specificity for the identification of HER2-positive EC was 100 and 97%, respectively, using a HER2 testing algorithm that recommends DISH in all cases with moderate membranous staining in >10% of the tumour (IHC+). Performing DISH on all IHC-2+ and -3+ cases yields a sensitivity and specificity of 100%.

CONCLUSIONS:

Our EC-specific HER2 IHC scoring method is reproducible. A screening strategy based on IHC scoring on all cases with subsequent DISH testing on IHC-2+/-3+ cases has perfect test accuracy for identifying HER2-positive EC.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Algoritmos / Biomarcadores Tumorais / Neoplasias do Endométrio / Receptor ErbB-2 Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Histopathology Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Holanda

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Algoritmos / Biomarcadores Tumorais / Neoplasias do Endométrio / Receptor ErbB-2 Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Histopathology Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Holanda