Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Developing and Implementing a Standardized Ictal Examination in the Epilepsy Monitoring Unit.
O'Kula, Susanna S; Faillace, Lisa; Kulick-Soper, Catherine V; Reyes-Esteves, Sahily; Raab, Jackie; Davis, Kathryn A; Kheder, Ammar; Hill, Chloe E.
Afiliação
  • O'Kula SS; Department of Neurology (SSO'K), New York University; Department of Neurology (LF, CVK-S, SR-E, KAD), University of Pennsylvania; Department of Neurology (JR), Jefferson Hospital, Philadelphia, PA; Department of Neurology (AK), Emory University, Atlanta, GA; and Department of Neurology (CEH), Univer
  • Faillace L; Department of Neurology (SSO'K), New York University; Department of Neurology (LF, CVK-S, SR-E, KAD), University of Pennsylvania; Department of Neurology (JR), Jefferson Hospital, Philadelphia, PA; Department of Neurology (AK), Emory University, Atlanta, GA; and Department of Neurology (CEH), Univer
  • Kulick-Soper CV; Department of Neurology (SSO'K), New York University; Department of Neurology (LF, CVK-S, SR-E, KAD), University of Pennsylvania; Department of Neurology (JR), Jefferson Hospital, Philadelphia, PA; Department of Neurology (AK), Emory University, Atlanta, GA; and Department of Neurology (CEH), Univer
  • Reyes-Esteves S; Department of Neurology (SSO'K), New York University; Department of Neurology (LF, CVK-S, SR-E, KAD), University of Pennsylvania; Department of Neurology (JR), Jefferson Hospital, Philadelphia, PA; Department of Neurology (AK), Emory University, Atlanta, GA; and Department of Neurology (CEH), Univer
  • Raab J; Department of Neurology (SSO'K), New York University; Department of Neurology (LF, CVK-S, SR-E, KAD), University of Pennsylvania; Department of Neurology (JR), Jefferson Hospital, Philadelphia, PA; Department of Neurology (AK), Emory University, Atlanta, GA; and Department of Neurology (CEH), Univer
  • Davis KA; Department of Neurology (SSO'K), New York University; Department of Neurology (LF, CVK-S, SR-E, KAD), University of Pennsylvania; Department of Neurology (JR), Jefferson Hospital, Philadelphia, PA; Department of Neurology (AK), Emory University, Atlanta, GA; and Department of Neurology (CEH), Univer
  • Kheder A; Department of Neurology (SSO'K), New York University; Department of Neurology (LF, CVK-S, SR-E, KAD), University of Pennsylvania; Department of Neurology (JR), Jefferson Hospital, Philadelphia, PA; Department of Neurology (AK), Emory University, Atlanta, GA; and Department of Neurology (CEH), Univer
  • Hill CE; Department of Neurology (SSO'K), New York University; Department of Neurology (LF, CVK-S, SR-E, KAD), University of Pennsylvania; Department of Neurology (JR), Jefferson Hospital, Philadelphia, PA; Department of Neurology (AK), Emory University, Atlanta, GA; and Department of Neurology (CEH), Univer
Neurol Clin Pract ; 11(2): 127-133, 2021 Apr.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33842065
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The ictal examination is crucial for neuroanatomic localization of seizure onset, which informs medical and neurosurgical treatment of epilepsy. Substantial variation exists in ictal examination performance in epilepsy monitoring units (EMUs). We developed and implemented a standardized examination to facilitate rapid, reliable execution of all testing domains and adherence to patient safety maneuvers.

METHODS:

Following observation of examination performance, root cause analysis of barriers, and review of consensus guidelines, an ictal examination was developed and disseminated. In accordance with quality improvement methodology, revisions were enacted following the initial intervention, including differentiation between pathways for convulsive and nonconvulsive seizures. We evaluated ictal examination fidelity, efficiency, and EMU staff satisfaction before and after the intervention.

RESULTS:

We identified barriers to ictal examination performance as confusion regarding ictal examination protocol, inadequate education of the rationale for the examination and its components, and lack of awareness of patient-specific goals. Over an 18-month period, 100 ictal examinations were reviewed, 50 convulsive and 50 nonconvulsive. Ictal examination performance varied during the study period without sustained improvement for convulsive or nonconvulsive seizure examination. The new examination was faster to perform (0.8 vs 1.5 minutes). Postintervention, EMU staff expressed satisfaction with the examination, but many still did not understand why certain components were performed.

CONCLUSION:

We identified key barriers to EMU ictal assessment and completed real-world testing of a standardized, streamlined ictal examination. We found it challenging to reliably change ictal examination performance in our EMU; further study of implementation is warranted.

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Guideline Idioma: En Revista: Neurol Clin Pract Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Guideline Idioma: En Revista: Neurol Clin Pract Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article