Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Initial experience with slimmest single-use flexible ureteroscope Uscope PU3033A (PUSEN™) in retrograde intrarenal surgery and its comparison with Uscope PU3022a: a single-center prospective study.
Agrawal, Shashank; Patil, Abhijit; Sabnis, Ravindra B; Singh, Abhishek G; Ganpule, Arvind P; Desai, Mahesh R.
Afiliação
  • Agrawal S; Muljibhai Patel Urological Hospital, Nadiad, India. shank789agrawal@gmail.com.
  • Patil A; Department of Urology, Muljibhai Patel Urological Hospital, Dr. Virendra Desai Road, Nadiad, Gujarat, 387991, India. shank789agrawal@gmail.com.
  • Sabnis RB; Muljibhai Patel Urological Hospital, Nadiad, India.
  • Singh AG; Muljibhai Patel Urological Hospital, Nadiad, India.
  • Ganpule AP; Muljibhai Patel Urological Hospital, Nadiad, India.
  • Desai MR; Muljibhai Patel Urological Hospital, Nadiad, India.
World J Urol ; 39(10): 3957-3962, 2021 Oct.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33970313
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

Single-use disposable digital flexible ureterorenoscope has become an attractive option to reusable scope with many advantages. Currently available single-use digital fURS have outer shaft diameter above 9 Fr which requires large access sheath insertion and sometimes double J stent placement. Recently, 7.5 Fr single-use digital fURS is introduced in market by Pusen. Objective of this study is to compare two Pusen single-use scopes in the clinical

setting:

7.5 Fr Uscope PU3033A and 9.5 Fr Uscope PU3022A.

METHODS:

30 patients, having renal stones < 2 cm, planned for RIRS were prospectively randomized to two groups group 1 had 15 patients in which 7.5 Fr Uscope PU3033A and group 2 had 15 patients in which 9.5 Fr Uscope PU3022A was used. The various pre-operative, intra-operative, and post-operative parameters at 1 month along with complications were evaluated for both the scopes by a single surgical team.

RESULTS:

Pre-operative parameters including stone characteristics were comparable in both the groups. Three patients in group 2 needed ureteric dilatation prior to 11/13 access sheath insertion, while 10/12 Fr access sheath was placed in all patients in group 1 without manipulation (p = 0.06). Intra-operative vision was comparable in both scopes with an empty working channel and with laser. Hazy vision while lasing in two and one patient in group 1 and group 2, respectively (p = 0.54). In group 1, one had fever and UTI, while in group 2, one had fever post-operatively.

CONCLUSION:

7.5 Fr Uscope PU3033A could be introduced with smaller access sheath. The vision, deflection, maneuverability is comparable to 9.5 Fr Uscope PU3022a.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Complicações Pós-Operatórias / Cálculos Renais / Ureteroscopia / Ureteroscópios Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: World J Urol Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Índia

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Complicações Pós-Operatórias / Cálculos Renais / Ureteroscopia / Ureteroscópios Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: World J Urol Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Índia