Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Physicians' perceptions of breast density notification laws and appropriate patient follow-up.
Manning, Mark; O'Neill, Suzanne; Purrington, Kristen.
Afiliação
  • Manning M; Department of Oncology, Karmanos Cancer Institute, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI, USA.
  • O'Neill S; Department of Oncology, Lombardi Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA.
  • Purrington K; Department of Oncology, Karmanos Cancer Institute, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI, USA.
Breast J ; 27(7): 586-594, 2021 07.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33991030
Breast density notification laws have been adopted in the absence of consistent guidelines for post-notification follow-up. This can lead to inconsistent and potentially deficient management of women's health due to inconsistent physician practices. We examined physicians' knowledge and practices regarding follow-up for patients who receive density notifications. Physicians who referred patients to a Michigan hospital network for screening mammograms were recruited to participate in survey study; 105 (29.8%) responded. The survey assessed physicians' demographics, knowledge, and awareness of breast density and breast cancer risk and of density notification laws, and perceptions of appropriate follow-up behaviors for their patients who received density notifications. Most physicians (75%) knew about the notification law, and they were generally comfortable responding to breast density questions and deciding on follow-up. Most indicated that additional breast imaging (68.0%), followed by assessing breast cancer risk (24.7%) were appropriate follow-up responses. Physicians who performed breast cancer risk assessments, and who were more comfortable with breast density questions and follow-up decision making, were more likely to propose additional imaging. Male physicians were less likely to propose assessing breast cancer risk, and less likely to propose clinical and/or breast self-examinations. Divergence between practice and guidelines when it comes to supplemental breast cancer screening, coupled with density notification language that promotes additional screening in the absence of consistent evidence, remains concerning. Improved understanding of how density notification recipients and their physicians make decisions about supplemental screening is warranted to ensure that breast cancer risk is properly considered.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Médicos / Neoplasias da Mama Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Risk_factors_studies / Screening_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Breast J Assunto da revista: NEOPLASIAS Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Médicos / Neoplasias da Mama Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Risk_factors_studies / Screening_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Breast J Assunto da revista: NEOPLASIAS Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos