Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Determining Collision Cross Sections from Differential Ion Mobility Spectrometry.
Ieritano, Christian; Lee, Arthur; Crouse, Jeff; Bowman, Zack; Mashmoushi, Nour; Crossley, Paige M; Friebe, Benjamin P; Campbell, J Larry; Hopkins, W Scott.
Afiliação
  • Ieritano C; Department of Chemistry, University of Waterloo, 200 University Avenue West, Waterloo N2L 3G1, Ontario, Canada.
  • Lee A; WaterMine Innovation, Inc., Waterloo N0B 2T0, Ontario, Canada.
  • Crouse J; Waterloo Institute for Nanotechnology, University of 200 University Avenue West, Waterloo N2L 3G1, Ontario, Canada.
  • Bowman Z; Department of Chemistry, University of Waterloo, 200 University Avenue West, Waterloo N2L 3G1, Ontario, Canada.
  • Mashmoushi N; WaterMine Innovation, Inc., Waterloo N0B 2T0, Ontario, Canada.
  • Crossley PM; Waterloo Institute for Nanotechnology, University of 200 University Avenue West, Waterloo N2L 3G1, Ontario, Canada.
  • Friebe BP; Department of Chemistry, University of Waterloo, 200 University Avenue West, Waterloo N2L 3G1, Ontario, Canada.
  • Campbell JL; WaterMine Innovation, Inc., Waterloo N0B 2T0, Ontario, Canada.
  • Hopkins WS; Department of Chemistry, University of Waterloo, 200 University Avenue West, Waterloo N2L 3G1, Ontario, Canada.
Anal Chem ; 2021 Jun 16.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34132546
ABSTRACT
The experimental determination of ion-neutral collision cross sections (CCSs) is generally confined to ion mobility spectrometry (IMS) technologies that operate under the so-called low-field limit or those that enable empirical calibration strategies (e.g., traveling wave IMS; TWIMS). Correlation of ion trajectories to CCS in other non-linear IMS techniques that employ dynamic electric fields, such as differential mobility spectrometry (DMS), has remained a challenge since its inception. Here, we describe how an ion's CCS can be measured from DMS experiments using a machine learning (ML)-based calibration. The differential mobility of 409 molecular cations (m/z 86-683 Da and CCS 110-236 Å2) was measured in a N2 environment to train the ML framework. Several open-source ML routines were tested and trained using DMS-MS data in the form of the parent ion's m/z and the compensation voltage required for elution at specific separation voltages between 1500 and 4000 V. The best performing ML model, random forest regression, predicted CCSs with a mean absolute percent error of 2.6 ± 0.4% for analytes excluded from the training set (i.e., out-of-the-bag external validation). This accuracy approaches the inherent statistical error of ∼2.2% for the MobCal-MPI CCS calculations employed for training purposes and the <2% threshold for matching literature CCSs with those obtained on a TWIMS platform.

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Anal Chem Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Canadá

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Anal Chem Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Canadá