Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Criteria-based curation of a therapy-focused compendium to support treatment recommendations in precision oncology.
Lin, Frank P; Thavaneswaran, Subotheni; Grady, John P; Ballinger, Mandy; Kansara, Maya; Oakes, Samantha R; Desai, Jayesh; Lee, Chee Khoon; Simes, John; Thomas, David M.
Afiliação
  • Lin FP; Kinghorn Centre for Clinical Genomics, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Sydney, NSW, Australia. f.lin@garvan.org.au.
  • Thavaneswaran S; NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia. f.lin@garvan.org.au.
  • Grady JP; St. Vincent's Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia. f.lin@garvan.org.au.
  • Ballinger M; NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
  • Kansara M; St. Vincent's Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
  • Oakes SR; The Kinghorn Cancer Centre, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
  • Desai J; St. Vincent's Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
  • Lee CK; The Kinghorn Cancer Centre, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
  • Simes J; St. Vincent's Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
  • Thomas DM; The Kinghorn Cancer Centre, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
NPJ Precis Oncol ; 5(1): 58, 2021 Jun 23.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34162978
ABSTRACT
While several resources exist that interpret therapeutic significance of genomic alterations in cancer, many regional real-world issues limit access to drugs. There is a need for a pragmatic, evidence-based, context-adapted tool to guide clinical management based on molecular biomarkers. To this end, we have structured a compendium of approved and experimental therapies with associated biomarkers following a survey of drug regulatory databases, existing knowledge bases, and published literature. Each biomarker-disease-therapy triplet was categorised using a tiering system reflective of key therapeutic considerations approved and reimbursed therapies with respect to a jurisdiction (Tier 1), evidence of efficacy or approval in another jurisdiction (Tier 2), evidence of antitumour activity (Tier 3), and plausible biological rationale (Tier 4). Two resistance categories were defined lack of efficacy (Tier R1) or antitumor activity (Tier R2). Based on this framework, we curated a digital resource focused on drugs relevant in the Australian healthcare system (TOPOGRAPH Therapy Oriented Precision Oncology Guidelines for Recommending Anticancer Pharmaceuticals). As of November 2020, TOPOGRAPH comprised 2810 biomarker-disease-therapy triplets in 989 expert-appraised entries, including 373 therapies, 199 biomarkers, and 106 cancer types. In the 345 therapies catalogued, 84 (24%) and 65 (19%) were designated Tiers 1 and 2, respectively, while 271 (79%) therapies were supported by preclinical studies, early clinical trials, retrospective studies, or case series (Tiers 3 and 4). A companion algorithm was also developed to support rational, context-appropriate treatment selection informed by molecular biomarkers. This framework can be readily adapted to build similar resources in other jurisdictions to support therapeutic decision-making.

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: NPJ Precis Oncol Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Austrália

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: NPJ Precis Oncol Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Austrália