The question is not, "can they talk"?
J Med Philos
; 13(2): 213-21, 1988 May.
Article
em En
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-3418249
ABSTRACT
An argument for denying moral rights to nonhuman species is that beliefs, desires, and interests are inherent in the normal human capacity for speech and, since only humans are linguistically capable, only humans can have rights. We argue that linguistics and many conceptual abilities are ontogenetically independent in humans and that various morally relevant mental capacities can exist independently. We also then argue that phylogenetic independence is also possible and hence, that the concept of an inherent dependence of moral standing on having linguistic capabilities is insufficient for denying rights to nonhumans.
Palavras-chave
Buscar no Google
Base de dados:
MEDLINE
Assunto principal:
Vocalização Animal
/
Bem-Estar do Animal
/
Obrigações Morais
/
Experimentação Animal
/
Características Humanas
/
Animais de Laboratório
/
Princípios Morais
Limite:
Animals
Idioma:
En
Revista:
J Med Philos
Ano de publicação:
1988
Tipo de documento:
Article