Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Tunnelled Peritoneal Catheter for Malignant Ascites-An Open-Label, Prospective, Observational Trial.
Petzold, Golo; Bremer, Sebastian C B; Heuschert, Felix C; Treiber, Hannes; Ellenrieder, Volker; Kunsch, Steffen; Neesse, Albrecht.
Afiliação
  • Petzold G; Department of Gastroenterology, Gastrointestinal Oncology and Endocrinology, University Medical Center Goettingen, 37075 Goettingen, Germany.
  • Bremer SCB; Department of Gastroenterology, Gastrointestinal Oncology and Endocrinology, University Medical Center Goettingen, 37075 Goettingen, Germany.
  • Heuschert FC; Department of Gastroenterology, Gastrointestinal Oncology and Endocrinology, University Medical Center Goettingen, 37075 Goettingen, Germany.
  • Treiber H; Department of Hematology and Oncology, University Medical Center Goettingen, 37075 Goettingen, Germany.
  • Ellenrieder V; Department of Gastroenterology, Gastrointestinal Oncology and Endocrinology, University Medical Center Goettingen, 37075 Goettingen, Germany.
  • Kunsch S; Department of Gastroenterology, Gastrointestinal Oncology and Endocrinology, University Medical Center Goettingen, 37075 Goettingen, Germany.
  • Neesse A; Department of Gastroenterology, Gastrointestinal Oncology and Endocrinology, University Medical Center Goettingen, 37075 Goettingen, Germany.
Cancers (Basel) ; 13(12)2021 Jun 11.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34208108
ABSTRACT
Treatment of recurrent malignant ascites in cancer patients is a challenge. Evidence based guidelines regarding the best treatment strategy are lacking. The aim of this prospective study was to investigate the safety and efficacy of a tunnelled peritoneal catheter (PleurX) in cancer patients with symptomatic ascites. Patients with symptomatic, diuretics-refractory ascites and indication for the implantation of a tunnelled peritoneal PleurX catheter were prospectively enrolled between August 2018 and July 2020. The number of catheter days, complications, amount of drained ascites and ascites-associated symptoms and hospitalization rate pre- and post-PleurX insertion were analysed. 51 Patients (64.7% male) were prospectively enrolled. The mean age was 66.6 (±7.9) years. The most common cause of ascites was pancreatic adenocarcinoma (n = 10) followed by cholangiocellular carcinoma (n = 9) and hepatocellular carcinoma (n = 8). The technical success rate of PleurX implantation was 100%. The mean volume of weakly drained ascites was 5.44l (±4.08). Major complications included cellulitis (n = 2), peritonitis and drainage dislocation (each n = 1). The mean catheter days per patient was 59.8 (±107.4) (Min 4, Max 668). Abdominal discomfort, impaired mobility, dyspnoea, fatigue, nausea and vomiting were significantly reduced 30 days after PleurX insertion (p < 0.05). Moreover, hospitalization rate was significantly reduced (p < 0.001; 27.08% of days preimplantation vs. 11.27% postimplantation). We conclude that implantation of a tunnelled ascites catheter is a safe and effective method for the treatment of refractory ascites in cancer patients with advanced disease. Serious complications are rare. Burdensome ascites-associated symptoms and hospitalization rates can be significantly reduced over a longer period of time.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: Cancers (Basel) Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Alemanha

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: Cancers (Basel) Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Alemanha