Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A Delphi study to identify intervention priorities to prevent the occurrence and reduce the impact of adverse childhood experiences.
Sahle, Berhe W; Reavley, Nicola J; Morgan, Amy J; Yap, Marie Bee Hui; Reupert, Andrea; Jorm, Anthony F.
Afiliação
  • Sahle BW; Centre for Mental Health, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
  • Reavley NJ; Centre for Mental Health, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
  • Morgan AJ; Centre for Mental Health, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
  • Yap MBH; Centre for Mental Health, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
  • Reupert A; School of Psychological Sciences and Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
  • Jorm AF; Faculty of Education, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Aust N Z J Psychiatry ; 56(6): 686-694, 2022 06.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34231407
OBJECTIVE: There is a lack of a systematic, coordinated approach to reducing the occurrence and impact of adverse childhood experiences. Hence, identifying feasible intervention priorities in this field will help inform policy and reformation of ongoing service delivery. The objective of this study was to identify expert consensus-driven priority interventions for reducing the occurrence and impact of adverse childhood experiences in children under 8 years of age in the Australian context. METHODS: A three-round online Delphi survey was conducted to establish consensus on 34 interventions for adverse childhood experiences identified through a literature search. Six were general categories of interventions, 6 were broad intervention programmes and 22 were specific interventions. Participants were 17 health practitioners, 15 researchers, 9 policy experts, 7 educators and 3 consumer advocates with expertise in adverse childhood experiences or child mental health. Consensus was defined as an intervention being rated as 'very high priority' or 'high priority' according to its importance and feasibility by ⩾75% of all experts. RESULTS: Seven of the 34 interventions were endorsed as priority interventions for adverse childhood experiences. These included four general categories of intervention: community-wide interventions, parenting programmes, home-visiting programmes and psychological interventions. Two broad intervention programmes were also endorsed: school-based anti-bullying interventions and psychological therapies for children exposed to trauma. Positive Parenting Program was the only specific intervention that achieved consensus. CONCLUSION: This is the first study to identify stakeholder perspectives on intervention priorities to prevent the occurrence and impact of adverse childhood experiences. Prioritisation of effective, feasible and implementable intervention programmes is an important step towards better integration and coordination of ongoing service delivery to effectively prevent and respond to adverse childhood experiences.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Experiências Adversas da Infância Tipo de estudo: Guideline Limite: Child / Humans País/Região como assunto: Oceania Idioma: En Revista: Aust N Z J Psychiatry Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Austrália

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Experiências Adversas da Infância Tipo de estudo: Guideline Limite: Child / Humans País/Região como assunto: Oceania Idioma: En Revista: Aust N Z J Psychiatry Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Austrália