Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Surgical repair of subaortic stenosis resection: 10 years of single-center experience in 65 patients.
Cao, Yuefeng; Yang, Shuang; Li, Wenxiu; Li, Lei; Su, Junwu; Fan, Xiangming.
Afiliação
  • Cao Y; Department of Pediatric Cardiac Center, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
  • Yang S; Department of Pediatric Cardiac Center, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
  • Li W; Department of Pediatric Cardiac Center, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
  • Li L; Department of Pediatric Cardiac Center, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
  • Su J; Department of Pediatric Cardiac Center, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
  • Fan X; Department of Pediatric Cardiac Center, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
J Card Surg ; 36(10): 3593-3598, 2021 Oct.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34339531
BACKGROUND: Subaortic stenosis (SAS) was a rare congenital heart disease of left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT), ranging from "isolated" lesions to "tunnel" or "diffuse" lesions. We conducted a retrospective study to describe the characteristics of patients with different lesions and analyze the risk factors for reoperation. METHODS: In this study, we examined a single-center retrospective cohort of SAS patients undergoing resection from 2010 to 2019. Patients were classified as simple lesion group (n = 37) or complex lesion group (n = 28). Demographics, perioperative findings, and clinical data were analyzed. RESULTS: The surgical effect of the two groups was significantly lower than that before the operation (p < .05). The median age at operation was 6 (3-11.8) years. There was no operative mortality. In complex lesion group, cardiopulmonary bypass time (CPB time), aortic cross-clamping time (ACC time), mechanical ventilation time, and intensive care unit (ICU) stay time were longer. The median follow-up period was 2.8 years (range: 1-3.8), with two late death. Six patients (9.2%) required reoperation due to restenosis or severe aortic insufficiency. The freedom from reoperation rates at 5 years was 66.7% for simple lesion but only 52.3% for complex lesion (p = .036). CONCLUSIONS: Although the lesions include many forms, SAS resection was still satisfactory. However, the reoperation after initial surgical treatment was not infrequent, especially in patients with complex lesion.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Estenose Aórtica Subvalvar Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans / Infant Idioma: En Revista: J Card Surg Assunto da revista: CARDIOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: China

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Estenose Aórtica Subvalvar Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans / Infant Idioma: En Revista: J Card Surg Assunto da revista: CARDIOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: China