Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Newborn Pulse Oximetry Screening at a Community Hospital: An 8-Year Experience.
Schwartz, Bryanna N; Hom, Lisa A; Von Kohorn, Isabelle; Becker, Jeffrey; Cuzzi, Sandra S; Clarke, Sue Ellin Grier; Kiernan, Sharon C; Martin, Gerard R.
Afiliação
  • Schwartz BN; Division of Cardiology, Children's National Heart Institute bnschwartz@childrensnational.org.
  • Hom LA; Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, The George Washington University, Washington, District of Columbia.
  • Von Kohorn I; Division of Cardiology, Children's National Heart Institute.
  • Becker J; Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, The George Washington University, Washington, District of Columbia.
  • Cuzzi SS; Division of Neonatal Medicine.
  • Clarke SEG; Community Neonatal Associates, Silver Spring, Maryland.
  • Kiernan SC; Division of Cardiology, Children's National Heart Institute.
  • Martin GR; Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, The George Washington University, Washington, District of Columbia.
Pediatrics ; 148(3)2021 09.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34429338
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

To evaluate newborn pulse oximetry screening (POS) outcomes at a large community hospital and the impact of the recommended revised POS algorithm.

METHODS:

A retrospective cohort study was performed to evaluate the results of POS in the well-infant nursery between 2012 and 2020. The POS results were obtained from an electronic platform. Chart review was completed for newborns with failed screens. The recommended revision to POS, no second rescreen, was applied to the data to evaluate screening outcomes.

RESULTS:

Of the total 65 414 infants admitted to the well-infant nursery during this 8-year period, >99% (n = 64 780) received POS. Thirty-one infants failed POS (4.6 per 10 000 screened). All infants who failed POS were found to have a disorder, with 12 (39%) having critical congenital heart disease (CCHD), 9 (29%) having non-CCHD requiring further follow-up, and 10 (32%) having noncardiac conditions. One false-negative screen result was identified through the Maryland Department of Health Newborn Screening Follow-up Program. The positive predictive value of POS for those screened was 39% for CCHD, with a specificity of 99.97%. Eliminating the second rescreen in the POS algorithm would have resulted in an additional 5 newborns without CCHD failing POS, increasing the false-positive rate from 0.03% to 0.04%.

CONCLUSIONS:

POS is an effective tool for identifying CCHD and secondary conditions. POS was successfully implemented with few missed screens and was highly specific. Elimination of the second rescreen in the pulse oximetry algorithm would have resulted in a minimal increase in false-positive results and faster evaluation of newborns with CCHD.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Oximetria / Triagem Neonatal / Cardiopatias Congênitas Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Screening_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Male / Newborn País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Pediatrics Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Oximetria / Triagem Neonatal / Cardiopatias Congênitas Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Screening_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Male / Newborn País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Pediatrics Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article