Induced radiofrequency fields in patients undergoing MR examinations: insights for risk assessment.

ABSTRACT

Purpose. To characterize and quantify the induced radiofrequency (RF) electric (E)-fields andB1+rmsfields in patients undergoing magnetic resonance (MR) examinations; to provide guidance on aspects of RF heating risks for patients with and without implants; and to discuss some strengths and limitations of safety assessments in current ISO, IEC, and ASTM standards to determine the RF heating risks for patients with and without implants.Methods. InducedE-fields andB1+rmsfields during 1.5 T and 3 T MR examinations were numerically estimated for high-resolution patient models of the Virtual Population exposed to ten two-port birdcage RF coils from head to feet imaging landmarks over the full polarization space, as well as in surrogate ASTM phantoms.Results. Worst-caseB1+rmsexposure greater than 3.5µT (1.5 T) and 2µT (3 T) must be considered for all MR examinations at the Normal Operating Mode limit. Representative inducedE-field and specific absorption rate distributions under different clinical scenarios allow quick estimation of clinical factors of high and reduced exposure.B1shimming can cause +6 dB enhancements toE-fields along implant trajectories. The distribution and magnitude of inducedE-fields in the ASTM phantom differ from clinical exposures and are not always conservative for typical implant locations.Conclusions.Field distributions in patient models are condensed, visualized for quick estimation of risks, and compared to those induced in the ASTM phantom. InducedE-fields in patient models can significantly exceed those in the surrogate ASTM phantom in some cases. In the recent 19ε2revision of the ASTM F2182 standard, the major shortcomings of previous versions have been addressed by requiring that the relationship between ASTM test conditions andin vivotangentialE-fields be established, e.g. numerically. With this requirement, the principal methods defined in the ASTM standard for passive implants are reconciled with those of the ISO 10974 standard for active implantable medical devices.