Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Efficacy and safety of botulinum toxin for treating sialorrhea: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Yu, Ya-Chien; Chung, Chen-Chih; Tu, Yu-Kang; Hong, Chien-Tai; Chen, Kee-Hsin; Tam, Ka-Wai; Kuan, Yi-Chun.
Afiliação
  • Yu YC; School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.
  • Chung CC; Taipei Neuroscience Institute, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.
  • Tu YK; Department of Neurology, Taipei Medical University Shuang Ho Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan.
  • Hong CT; Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.
  • Chen KH; Institute of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, College of Public Health, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.
  • Tam KW; Taipei Neuroscience Institute, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.
  • Kuan YC; Department of Neurology, Taipei Medical University Shuang Ho Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan.
Eur J Neurol ; 29(1): 69-80, 2022 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34449931
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND

PURPOSE:

Sialorrhea often happens in patients with neurologic disorders, and botulinum toxin (BoNT), which inhibits acetylcholine activation, may be an effective treatment for drooling. This systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized control trials aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of BoNT in adults and children with sialorrhea due to neurological disorders.

METHODS:

The PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched for relevant studies published before August 2021. The pooled estimate of outcomes was calculated using a random effect model.

RESULTS:

The review included 17 studies involving 981 patients. Compared with placebo, both BoNT type A (BoNT-A) and BoNT type B (BoNT-B) alleviated drooling frequency and severity (mean difference, 95% CI; BoNT-A -1.20, -1.89 to -0.51; BoNT-B -1.62, -2.07 to -1.17), reduced saliva weight (BoNT-A -1.70, -2.30 to -1.10; BoNT-B -1.12, -1.97 to -0.27), and improved global impression of change (BoNT-A -1.30, -1.73 to -0.86; BoNT-B -1.58, -1.95 to -1.21) in adults 4 weeks postinjection. BoNT-B remained effective at 12 weeks. In children, BoNT-A and BoNT-B alleviated sialorrhea symptoms (BoNT-A -1.63, -2.42 to -0.85; BoNT-B -5.20, -6.03 to -4.37) and BoNT-A reduced saliva weight (-0.77, -1.54 to 0.00) at 4 weeks postinjection. After 12 weeks, BoNT-B remained efficacious. Most adverse effects (AEs) were mild to moderate and self-limited.

CONCLUSIONS:

There is moderate certainty of evidence (COE) that either BoNT-A or BoNT-B could relieve sialorrhea after 4 and 12 weeks of follow-up without significantly more severe AEs in adults. However, the COE is very low to low in children.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Sialorreia / Toxinas Botulínicas Tipo A / Fármacos Neuromusculares Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Child / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Eur J Neurol Assunto da revista: NEUROLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Taiwan

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Sialorreia / Toxinas Botulínicas Tipo A / Fármacos Neuromusculares Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Child / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Eur J Neurol Assunto da revista: NEUROLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Taiwan