Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The impact of implementing a psychiatric emergency hotline on the reduction of acute hospitalizations in a Swiss tertiary hospital.
Restellini, Aurélio; Kherad, Omar; Kaiser, Stefan.
Afiliação
  • Restellini A; Division of Psychiatry, Geneva University hospitals and University of Geneva, Chemin du Petit-Bel-Air 2, 1226 Thônex, Geneva, Switzerland. aurelio.restellini@gmail.com.
  • Kherad O; Department of Internal Medicine, La Tour Hospital and University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
  • Kaiser S; Division of Psychiatry, Geneva University hospitals and University of Geneva, Chemin du Petit-Bel-Air 2, 1226 Thônex, Geneva, Switzerland.
BMC Psychiatry ; 21(1): 425, 2021 08 31.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34465305
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Inpatient treatment is not the most beneficial treatment setting for many patients with psychiatric disorders and overcrowding is a recurrent problem for psychiatric hospitals. Therefore, it is important to develop strategies to limit avoidable inpatient treatment. This study sought to evaluate the impact of an emergency hotline that was developed to better manage psychiatric patients, particularly for identifying those requiring a hospital admission.

METHODS:

This pre-post intervention quality improvement study compared changes in the management of psychiatric patients' admission before and after the introduction of an emergency hotline where a specialist in psychiatry examines all inpatient referral from private practitioners. Main outcomes were the change in proportion of hospital admissions after referral from a private practitioner before and within 3 months after the intervention. Secondary outcomes were the average length of hospital stay, proportion of non-voluntary admission, the time required for triage and the impact of the intervention on treatments' costs. Fisher's Exact test was used to test the primary hypothesis of difference in the proportion of hospitalized patients before and after introduction of the emergency hotline. Secondary outcomes were tested with Student's t-test for continuous variables and Fishers's Exact test for proportions.

RESULTS:

Among 45 admission requests from private practitioners during the 3 months after introduction of the new emergency hotline, 25 (55.6%) were accepted as inpatient treatment, while 20 (44%) were redirected to more appropriate outpatient treatments. There was a highly significant difference from the baseline period during which all 34 requests were accepted (44% vs 100%, p < 0.001). In addition, for the patients hospitalized after the introduction of the emergency hotline there was a trend-level reduction of the average length of stay (9.32 days vs 17.35 days).

CONCLUSION:

Implementation of an emergency hotline manage by a specialist in psychiatry for admissions to acute psychiatric wards is feasible and simple to use. Importantly, it allows to significantly decrease the proportion of hospitalizations. Additional studies are needed to assess the generalizability of these exploratory results to other health care settings.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Linhas Diretas / Hospitalização Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: BMC Psychiatry Assunto da revista: PSIQUIATRIA Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Suíça

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Linhas Diretas / Hospitalização Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: BMC Psychiatry Assunto da revista: PSIQUIATRIA Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Suíça