A Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial of an Endoscopist Audit and Feedback Report for Colonoscopy.
Am J Gastroenterol
; 116(10): 2042-2051, 2021 10 01.
Article
em En
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-34515669
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION:
Variation in endoscopist performance contributes to poor-quality colonoscopy. Audit and feedback (A/F) can be used to improve physician performance, particularly among lower performing physicians. In this large pragmatic randomized controlled trial, we compared A/F to improve endoscopists' colonoscopy performance to usual practice.METHODS:
Endoscopists practicing in Ontario, Canada, in 2014 were randomly assigned in October 2015 (index date) to receive (intervention group, n = 417) or not receive (control group, n = 416) an A/F report generated centrally using health administrative data. Colonoscopy performance was measured in both groups over two 12-month periods prereport and postreport (relative to the index date). The primary outcome was polypectomy rate (PR). Secondary outcomes were cecal intubation rate, bowel preparation, and premature repeat after normal colonoscopy. A post hoc analysis used adenoma detection rate as the outcome. Outcomes were compared between groups for all endoscopists and for lower performing endoscopists using Poisson regression analyses under a difference-in-difference framework.RESULTS:
Among all endoscopists, PR did not significantly improve from prereport to postreport periods for those receiving the intervention (relative rate [RR], intervention vs control 1.07 vs 1.05, P = 0.09). Among lower performing endoscopists, PR improved significantly (RR, intervention vs control 1.34 vs 1.11, P = 0.02) in the intervention group compared with controls. In this subgroup, adenoma detection rate also improved but not significantly (RR, intervention vs control 1.12 vs 1.04, P = 0.12). There was no significant improvement in secondary outcomes between the intervention and control groups.DISCUSSION:
A/F reports for colonoscopy improve performance in lower performing endoscopists (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02595775).
Texto completo:
1
Base de dados:
MEDLINE
Assunto principal:
Colonoscopia
/
Competência Clínica
/
Melhoria de Qualidade
/
Feedback Formativo
/
Auditoria Médica
Tipo de estudo:
Clinical_trials
/
Diagnostic_studies
Limite:
Adult
/
Aged
/
Female
/
Humans
/
Male
/
Middle aged
País/Região como assunto:
America do norte
Idioma:
En
Revista:
Am J Gastroenterol
Ano de publicação:
2021
Tipo de documento:
Article
País de afiliação:
Canadá